Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, December 09, 2006

US Air Strike on Thar Thar
British/Danish Raid on Militias in Basra


The US military had a firefight on Friday in Ishaqi in Thar Thar, then troops on the ground called in air strikes on two houses used by the guerrillas. Twenty Iraqis were killed, including two women, according to the US. Local Iraqi police insisted that the houses belonged to civilian families and that children had been killed. The US denied it. At least one AP photograph does appear to show the
corpse of a child.

Aljazeera actually carried the American account* of the incident by Captain Frank Pasqual, along with a report on local assertions that 7 children were killed. I don't know if this coverage resulted from the US military trying harder with the Arabic press or from a change in policy at Aljazeera, which has usually tilted toward sympathy for what it calls the Sunni Arab resistance to occupation in Iraq, such that it seldom gave the American side.

Aljazeera says that local Iraqis in Ishaqi maintain that the US troops had entered the houses and killed people, then called down the air strikes to destroy the evidence.

The LA Times reports that 1,000 British and Danish troops conducted a raid on Friday in Basra on tribal/militia leaders involved in smuggling petroleum. Five houses were raided and weapons caches were found. One of the targets was said to be Sheikh Kadhim Abid Ali Batti, a chief of the Marsh Arab Karamisha (Garamsha) tribe, which is allied with the Mahdi Army of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. This was the largest military ooperation in the city since the 2003 invasion. The Sadr Movement vowed reprisal attacks.

Basra is the key export point for Iraqi petroleum, but has been plagued this year by militia and tribal violence. The militias and Marsh Arabs smuggle petroleum and fight turf wars with one another about it. It is not an exaggeration to say that unless security can be restored to Basra, and unless its militias and feuding clans can be brought under control, Iraq itself has a dim future.

Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani vehemently rejected the Iraq Study Group report on Friday. He especially took umbrage at the Baker-Hamilton positions that the referendum on the future of Kirkuk should be postponed, and that the Kurds should share the revenues from oil fields found in the future with the rest of Iraq.

Al-Hayat reports on Friday sermons in Iraq responding to the ISG report. Sunni cleric Shaikh Mahmud al-Sumaydaie of the Umm al-Qura Mosque in Baghdad said that thereby it is sought to solve the American crisis in Iraq but not to resolve the Iraq problem. He said that the problem is Iraqi on Iraqi, and the solution must be the same. He called on the government to do something about the mortar attacks on civilian (Sunni) neighborhoods in Baghdad.

In Najaf, Shaikh Sadr al-Din al-Qubanji of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq said that "the battle among Iraqis today is not sectarian but rather political." He urged that the small groups who felt themselves harmed by the overthrow of the Baath Party, and who had bet on sectarian warfare, be crushed. If that is done, he said, Iraq will emerge successful from its travails. He said that the solution depended on Iraqi political will and could not come from outside. He called for "political justice for all the sects, such that it is impossible that the majority should dominate the minority, or the minority the majority."

He rejected the ISG report's call for changes in the Iraqi constitution, saying that Iraqis drafted it and 12 million out of 15 million voters voted for it.

He did, however, praise the ISG recommendations as "reasonable" and admitted that they are congruent with Iraqi realities.

In Karbala, Shiite cleric Sayyid Ahmad al-Safi, a representative of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, said that the complicated problems of Iraq could only be resolved by its people, and that no solution could come from the outslide. He complained that political competition like that in Iraq happens in most of the countries of the world, but other people don't resort to killing and ethnic cleansing to achieve political goals. He called on the government to impose its sovereignty on the country.

In Najaf, one of the 4 Grand Ayatollahs spoke out. Muhammad Sa`id al-Hakim said that neighboring countries must forget the painful past for the sake of living together peacefully. In this way, peace and prosperity would encompass the region. He warned that "The problems will not remain confined within Iraq, but rather will produce a spark that will burn others." He said that the parties to the fighting must accept current reality and must deal with it responsibly.

Sa`id al-Hakim said that there is a sect that forms a tiny minority, but which nevertheless has survived government attempts to wipe it out. If that is so, he said, what is the solution when the Shiites, who are a majority, have been the victims of persecution.

Reuters reports political violence in Iraq on Friday. Major incidents:


' BAGHDAD - Police said they found 18 bodies dumped in different areas of Baghdad, all with gunshot wounds and many with signs of torture . . .

BAGHDAD - Four people were killed and eight wounded in a mortar attack on the religiously mixed Naharwan neighbourhood in southeastern Baghdad . . .

BAGHDAD - One person was killed and three wounded when gunmen attacked a crowd in the religiously mixed area of Amil in southwestern Baghdad . . .

TAL AFAR - A car bomb targeting an Iraqi army checkpoint in the town of Tal Afar . . . killed three civilians and wounded 15 people . . .'


Out of 1000 employees at the US embassy in Baghdad, only 6 are fluent in Arabic and only 33 know the language at all. If Iraq really was the central front in the "war on terror," and if the Bush administration really was fighting extremist "ideologies" (typically expressed in language and culture), then wouldn't you expect US officials there to know the language? I don't mean to take anything away from the foreign service professionals serving our country under dangerous circumstances. I just can't imagine what their superiors are thinking.
----

*The Aljazeera web link originally provided was incorrect, but I did see Pasqual on Aljazeera talking about Ishaqi.

13 Comments:

At 4:11 AM, Blogger gdamiani said...

Your item on Sheikh Kadhim Abid Ali Batti, a chief of the Marsh Arab Karamisha (Garamsha)

Are these the same Marsh Arabs "we" used to shed tears upon at the time of Saddam ? Am I the only one to see the irony in this or that maybe reality finally sinking in ?

Reality summed up beautifully Prof. Cole with your comment on "Out of 1000 employees at the US embassy in Baghdad, only 6 are fluent in Arabic"

 
At 9:49 AM, Blogger terry said...

Speaking their language might mean "we" might actually have to listen to "them"; that's no way to run an empire. (When we want your opinion we'll give it to you.)

Bush and company have an incredible facility for hyper-literalism, a symptom, I gather, of Asperger's.

Recall the word "front" can also refer to a decoy in a con game. Hence, the central "front" in the war-on!! terror.

Consider here also the use of "forge" in "forging a peace process" in Israel. Like forging a check, or forging currency.

People with any concern for actually communicating about the political process in the world should be extremely cautious about using auto-antonyms with the crowd now in power.

 
At 12:05 PM, Blogger ent lord said...

Given that after 9/11, anyone who had visited a Muslim country, had a Muslim ethnic background or relatives, or was fluent in Arabic was immediately under suspicion to the extent that giving to Arabic charities that were not considered "terroristic" at the time of the donation could land a contributor in the hot seat as the charity's status was changed retroactively.
Muslim countries are getting all of the news, for example the Texas farmer who is threatening to hold pig races on Muslim holy days as a deterrent to a mosque being constructed on property adjacent to him. Over 50% of AOL users polled think it is a good idea.
Xenophobia begets xenophobia and somehow we have empowered the worse elements of our society. The haters who opposed the Civil Rights Act went back under their rock for a while but now there seems to be some sort of bigot-chic attached to hating Muslims.
Al Jazeera is probably creating more anti-American sentiment by publishing our side of the story. Already, you can see neocon apologists claiming the pictures of the dead were "faked" or "altered". Armed Services Radio broadcasts Rush each day, with his blather that Abu Gharib was a "frat prank" like "Skull and Bones". This is the face we present to the Muslim world. It is amazing that there are not more attacks, as we feed the haters in society (on both sides)

 
At 2:01 PM, Blogger Timothy said...

One problem is that the Foreign Service uses the rotation system. An officer can be in Iraq for one tour and China the next. I had been interested in the Foreign Service during undergrad, but lost interest when I was told that I should expect to move to different duty stations outside of my area of study/interest/expertise.

What's the point of that?

 
At 3:38 PM, Blogger johnMccutchen said...

The New York Times reports that a deal on oil revenue sharing is close. The Kurds appear willing to accept revenue sharing on existing and future production. Seems highly significant because it weds the Kurds financially to the Iraqi State.

 
At 5:04 PM, Blogger von Nostrand said...

Professor Cole. Love your blog. If you have a moment, perhaps your readers would be interested in this connection between the ISG report and the recent death toll reported by the Lancet: http://bullbythehorns.blogspot.com/2006/12/with-regard-to-lancet-study.html

 
At 5:35 PM, Blogger English European said...

"Sa`id al-Hakim said that there is a sect that forms a tiny minority, but which nevertheless has survived government attempts to wipe it out"

Any idea what sect the Grand Ayatollah is referring to? Yazidi? Alevis? Alawite? Ismaili? Druze? Baha'i? I can't think.

 
At 6:10 PM, Blogger sasa said...

Juan, I expected better from you. Aljazeera "seldom gave the American side". Do you really believe that? How much Aljazeera do you watch?

Aljazeera was the first Arab news channel to interview Israeli officials. Aljazeera was even criticised by Saddam's government as being a tool for America by reporting its claims during the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

It is true that it doesn't turn to Washington-based commentators for an interpretation of events in Israel and Palestine. That's the norm from Anglo-American news channels.

But seldom giving the American side? White House press conferences carried live, Baghdad Green Zone announcements reported.

It is true that Aljazeera's tagline is 'the opinion and the other opinion', and yes, that often means broadcasting the perspective of Arabs alongside that of Americans.

That is something you won't see as often on CNN, but I don't think that counts as not giving the American side.

If I'm wrong, show us some evidence.

Best wishes,

Sasa, the Syria News Wire.

 
At 7:45 PM, Blogger dancewater said...

More than one AP photo shows more than one child killed in al-Ishaqi. And ample evidence that US forces did it.

 
At 10:05 PM, Blogger Glen Tomkins said...

"I just can't imagine what their superiors are thinking."

I can't imagine that their superiors are allowed to think. One of the many things this Republican political machine should be made to answer for is its systematic hobbling of our government, in all its departments, by the imposition of its very own political commissars on our professional and dedicated civil servants. It's a wonder anything gets done in the face of often deliberate sabotage by these political hacks.

 
At 11:12 PM, Blogger Billmon said...

"Out of 1000 employees at the US embassy in Baghdad, only 6 are fluent in Arabic."

I have to wonder how to what extent this is a reflection of the Israel lobby's witch hunt against the hated "Arabists" in the State Department. Certainly, it's been a long time since being an Arab specialist was a path to advancement in the U.S. government -- particularly under this adminstration.

Uncle Sam has systematically rid himself of the kind of expertise that might help him out of this terrible jam -- just as an earlier generation of China experts were run out of the State Department by the old (nationalist) China lobby and its McCarthyite allies. (See Halberstam's "The Best and the Brightest" for the gory details)

Marx said that history repeats -- first time as tragedy, second time as farce. But I see nothing funny about it.

 
At 11:45 PM, Blogger khawagga said...

Dear Mr. Cole,

I wanted to thank you for your writings on Iraq and the Middle East, and also point out an inaccuracy in the paragraph about Al Jazeera's coverage of the attack in Ishaqi. The linked story refers to an raid in Ramadi in November (the date on the story is Nov. 28), not the Ishaqi attack.

Also, I would caution against characterizing the Al Jazeera English website as the reporting of Al Jazeera, because they are different news entities even though they are under the same network.

Sorry for sending this again -- I'm not sure I understand how this feedback function works.

Sincerely,
Michael White

 
At 3:08 AM, Blogger Roger S said...

"Out of 1000 employees at the US embassy in Baghdad, only 6 are fluent in Arabic."

This linguistic short-sightedness reminds me of the time when during the Russian fiasco in Afghanistan a Russian soldier tried to defect to the American Embassy in Kabul, but there was not one member of the American delegation who spoke Russian.

Nice to read Billmon again. His recent absence from Whiskey Bar is sorely missed.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home