The Neoconservative Style & Weblog Awards
Michael J. Totten has surged way ahead in the voting online for the best Middle East weblog. The way he has done this is very instructive and tells us something about how the Neoconservatives always run rings around the American left and leave them with nothing to do but complain about Neoconservative power.
First, Totten demonized me and mobilized rightwingers in general and right-Zionists in particular to vote for him as a way of voting against Informed Comment.
One way he did this was to take a leaf from Karl Rove's campaign book. I had written that lead 9/11 hijacker Muhammad Atta wrote his will and testament, an implicit dedication to seeking martyrdom, in response to the 1996 Israel Grapes of Wrath attack on Lebanon. During Grapes of Wrath, the Israeli air force committed a massacre of civilians at a UN refugee station that no one in the UN thinks was an accident. The sight of those innocent, bloody children being pulled out of the rubble angered many in the Muslim world.
Pulitzer-prize winning author Lawrence Wright wrote in his Looming Tower, p. 307: "On April 11, 1996, when Atta was twenty-seven years old, he signed a standardized will he got from the al-Quds mosque.l It was the day Israel attacked Lebanon in Operation grapes of Wrath. According to one of his friends, Atta was enraged,and by filling out his last testament during the attack he was offering his life in response."
In my initial posting I had misremembered one detail, which is that the will was signed when Operation Grapes of Wrath began, not on the day of the Qana massacre. I corrected that within a few hours. But my over-all point was correct. Totten is still fulminating as though I had said something preposterous, and indeed, is using my quite legitimate point to suggest, as he has written around to others, that I am an "imbecile." It is dishonest of him not to acknowledge the Wright quote, which I have provided.
My larger point is that Israeli atrocities in Gaza are endangering American security. If the Israeli operation were something other than a cynical power play that almost wholly disregards civilian welfare, then the US would be right to support it and damn the consequences. But it is a shame to place our land and even our democracy in danger on behalf of a barbaric military operation.
These tactics ot Totten remind me very much of what Bush and Rove did to John Kerry in 2004, when Kerry complained that Bush had allowed Osama Bin Laden to escape at Tora Bora. Bush trotted out some military weasels to deny it all and then indicted Kerry for lack of patriotism. And he mobilized his base, and he won.
So that's how you do it. 1) You assassinate the character of your opponent. 2) You make his correct statements into a liability by propagandizing that they are false or unpatriotic. And 3) you mobilize a base of single-issue true believers that you can depend on to dominate the discourse because most people don't care and are not invested.
And that is how, having helped Obama win the 2008 election, the American left will still be marginalized and likely will gradually be supplanted in his counsels by rightwing organizations such as AIPAC, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (headed by Dennis Ross), the American Enterprise Institute, and so forth. They are good at demonizing opponents, good at twisting the truth, and good at strategic networking; and too few people who oppose their views are willing to put themselves out in any way.
It isn't material who wins that little weblog award. It is illuminating for our politics to see how they are accomplishing it.
/End

|
Facebook





42 Comments:
I agree with you completely, but I just thought I'd point out the irony of you admitting that neoconservatives will still be running circles around us for years to come right after publishing an article about the end of neo-conservatism in Salon.
Your article was about how everything the neo-cons have asserted has been flat out wrong, and you are correct in that. But I think you hit a more vital note today, discovering that their movement is not about be right, or generating good policy, it is about mobilizing their base and keeping themselves in the spotlight.
You realize that Rove and Bush, Ltd. plays dirty.
You know you're the best.
You KNOW we outnumber neocons in this country, if not online.
I voted yesterday, but I will cross-post today. We must fight back.
Thanks for being there.
These are horrid beings, but you go on and you make the difference that is necessary and I know that even when I argue with you.
These polls are indeed silly and are but another example of of U.S. culture merchandising everything. I'd never heard of Totten until this poll and Wiki says he "He supported the Iraq War."
THAT is all I need to know to understand that Totten doesn't have a clue about the Middle East much less mankind's history.
He REALLY needs to read the letters between Einstein and Freud about warfare and then check himself into a mental health institution.
Who needs awards? I'm surprised Juan can spare the energy to even care about this - his blogging is so comprehensive and spirited. There are so many more valid ways to gauge the validity and effectiveness of a political blog. ...or magazine. ...or work of fiction, music, or art. I'm personally baffled why anyone even cares about any Award. That said, I voted for Informed Comment. (Smile)
I think those who pander to the mob, know the mob will always outnumber the thoughtful.
Here is a link to a list that might be interesting and in line with your thoughts:
"25 Tactics of Truth Suppression"
www.benfrank.net/disinfo/
-BlueEyes-
I was watching this whole thing unfold. As I voted Informed Comments were surging ahead yesterday. Then I saw messages on IsraellyCool and M Totten, a direct appeal squarely against Juan Cole and a character attack against you. I was sad, because all you asked was to vote for informed comments in your earlier post, but they (israellycool and totten) invoked your name directly to their constituents and that worked for both of them. Sorry about that.
Totten did some good on-site reporting a while ago.
At some point he drank the Zionist Kool-aid.
Sad.
I had not heard of Michael Totten until I saw his name in the weblog voting. So I had a look at recent posting wherein he mentioned the city of Kiryat Shmona. So I searched for the population of Kiryat Shmona and found it is about 22,000. Yesterday I read about the "town" of Gaza City, population 400,000. That told me all I wanted to know about Totten.
The acquiecense of readers to this kind of continual propagandistic framing makes it impossible to assess the truth, which is of course why it is used, and the effect is as desired. Totten employs twisted meanings enthusiastically. Even Professor Cole, careful as he is, has recently fallen victim, mentioning either "settlers" (as opposed to squatters), "town", or "outpost", I regret I do not recall which. It would be nice if writers were self-correcting on this, but such are not the times, and we have no Edward R. Murrow around to restate journalistic ideals. It is up to readers to demand descriptive rather than propagandistic terms. I usually find Professor Cole to be scrupulous about using descriptive terms, which is why I value his posts.
You could put a banner on top of your site, at least every person who visits your site sees it. Also maybe a banner in dalykos or some other popular site would help...
Progressives are the majority in this country, I think. But we must build iINDPENDENT movement. In my opinion, we tend to assume that all we have to do is elect Democrats and then they will do the right thing. We've seen again and again that that isn't the case.
I applaud this post for raising an imporant issue. The right wing has it all over us when it comes to appealing to the fear and hate in people. We need to be able to counter that, without going down to the same level. It's not an easy riddle, but it's not impossible either.
Regardless of who got voted #1, the work you do couldn’t be measured by simple processes or propaganda. Some web logs encourage violence while curbing the voice of voiceless we all know that. To the extremists of all sorts; killing is saving lives, invasion and occupation is freedom. I wanted to commend you to disregard any measure save thousands of people who login to read your blog.
Take heart old boy - it's quality and integrity that counts and not the popularity gained by manipulating the unthinking masses through fraud and misrepresentation.
By the way, Gaza 2008: Micro-Wars and Macro-Wars, was one of the best blog posts on any topic I've ever read anywhere!
Reminds me of a high school popularity contest.
The winner is always the one who appeals to the middle common denominator, given the particular pasture in which one finds him/herself.
Sorry you got caught up in this at all.
History will know who worked diligently at discovering and telling the truth.
Not quite... The reason why you fell behind is technical rather than ideological. You surged ahead when your posting asking for votes was at the top of the page. However, the next day that posting feel to the second spot, so folk came along, read your new bit of work and then went away without voting for you.
If you look at your two main competitors, their postings asking for votes are ALWAYS at the top of the page. So their readers come along, remember that they have to vote, and do so.
You can win this at a canter, but your people have to be constantly made aware of the vote. So please stick a post up that will stay there until Tuesday when the polls close.
And please ask people to also vote for Neil Clark's Blog. Neil is up against Melanie Phillips who is basically Totten in a skirt.
Totten was one of the crazies who helped set up the Iraq The Model boys. I'm still waiting for somebody to blow the lid on that whole scam.
These Weblog awards have been manipulated since they were first conceived, and as a result they do not deserve serious attention. If they want to be taken seriously, they should start by banning people like Totten who use such tactics.
BTW my last two comments to Informed Comment have disappeared, hope this one makes it through.
I'm an everyday reader who very much wants you to win.
I'll do all I can to help.
It is the least I can do for someone who has kept the world so well informed.
I agree with EFKaplan's post. Luckily, the majority of American's can't be fooled for toooo long. Those that either can be fooled perennially, together with the few of the smarter and malicious ones in charge of playing the forever fooled as fools, are called "Neoconservatives."
It ALWAYS cracks me up when a hack feels like he or she can rail on an intelligent individual who has devoted his doctoral studies and life to understanding a subject. However, I've learned from my father-in-law that many people don't like the "educated." They'd rather follow someone around with free beer and a gun that has "FOR YOU, MR. AY-RAB" etched on it in crayon.
You do a wonderful post every day. Rejoice and be exceedingly glad that those like the Neocons reject it: That means you're right, smack-dab on the pathway of truth about the issue!
i waited through the load in order to vote for you.
punks.
I always thought(hoped) you were beyond such beauty contests.
JM
Totten's greater point is that you are blaming Israel for terrorism against the US, which you acknowledge in slightly different terms in this post.
Interesting that somehow Karl Rove and George Bush get brought up in a discussion, and the discussion is about how, as part of a liberal minority of nominees in the category, you're the victim of a neocon conspiracy to marginalize your voice. It would seem that you would be the beneficiary of a diluted conservative vote, but that doesn't seem to get through. It also seems that your complaint here is out of the standard whiney liberal playbook. It goes like this:
1. Apply the "neocon" label without providing any definition of what that means or how it is relevant, because the purpose of the label is to discredit the person it's applied to.
2. Invoke the names of Karl Rove and George Bush (maybe even Dick Cheney), whether they have anything to do with anything you're talking about or not, because your intended audience hates them and will pass that hatred along to anybody you're connecting to them.
3. Disregard the substance of anything said by the person you're disagreeing with -- never, ever address their points substantively, or even characterize them in anything approaching they way they say what they said.
4. Repeat how you were right all along, and they were always wrong/evil/stupid because, well, because of 1, 2 and 3 above.
What's perplexing is how those wily neocons are going to prevail in setting the policy in the Obama due to the effectiveness of their purported conspiracy after the final nail was placed in their coffin earlier today. How does that work?
As to those who are new to Totten and "seeing X told me all I needed to know," I'll tell them something they need to know and clearly don't -- Totten has traveled extensively in the region, and provides lengthy reports from his trips to places like Lebanon, Iraq (including extensive embedded time), Kosovo, and Georgia (the country). How about you inform yourself about what he's actually reported and said (fact and opinion) rather than discredit him based on some single point of opinion told to you by somebody else? I thought uninformed snap judgments and mindless following was the hallmark of neocons, not progressives? I'm a lot more apt to listen to criticism of Totten that is civil and levied by those who have logged more than half his field time.
Progressives are only a self defined majority. Nobody even knows what the word means.
Who cares who wins. We read you and we will continue to read you.
You are necessary to give us the news in the Middle East.
If we want to stay stupid we have the mass media and TV.
We don't, that why we are on the web. Meaning.......Juan Cole.
Ok, mea culpa, you shamed me into voting. It was really easy, no registration or passwords, It was so easy, I went back to see if I could vote twice- for research purposes... But my computer tattled, and the poll site directed me to the tally bar graph.
I don't get anyone that doesn't get the link between mechanized war video showing crushed moslem peoples, and extremist recruiting. The masters just can't get the point of the Moses story. 21st century USA is Rome, not Athens
I have been sent Totten columns from time to time; He spices his war op-eds as being on-site reporting, thought up while looking thru the fence at Lebanon (not the other way), or bouncing off a Russian border control point in Georgia.
His 'wandering eye' stories often seem to be about something that almost happened, but didn't. I remember one imbed episode, where he went on a scary night-time op in Iraq, and ALMOST saw some bad guys taken down. I was supposed to be impressed that our armed and frightened troops WOULD HAVE got the perps, if not for the very bad luck of having rousted and tossed the wrong family homes. I was also supposed to take note of the firm but gentle way the doors were forced and inhabitants herded together at gunpoint, while their rugs trampled and posessions searched in detail.
My take is that Totten appeals to folks who would really prefer a 'hooah!' Michael Yon hairy-chested war story. His endlessly run-on columns help them feel like they are being reasonable and cerebral, while puffing and preening for a fundamentally neocon line.
Anyway, thank you Prof Cole and guests, for making Informed Comment, worth reading,
The Lobby has fully mobilized right down to the weeds' roots. Just browse the comments sections to articles on any major newsite
BTW who is Michael J. Totten.
Until you mentioned the name, I'd never heard of him
Who cares about Totten? He doesn't speak Arabic, and he is absolutely ignorant of Arab and Muslim history. Forget about him.
If this were a contest about robotics or rap or some other issue lacking life threatening consequences (well, perhaps rap is not the best example), then I would say who cares about the petty games. However, the politics being used here, smears against Prof. Cole, are so characteristic of the neo-con way, and the consequences (raising awareness of Israeli brutality in Gaza as well as US forces misapplied in Iraq) are so important that it is not petty at all.
If not for Informed Content and like blogs, the neo-cons would claim all Americans agree with them. As it is, they will try to claim that anyway, but without the atmosphere of infallibility.
Vote, vote often, and don't believe the neo-con job.
As horrible as the Neocons and this Totten character are, the scariest thing I learned from the posting is that ... Dennis Ross is at the Washington Institute for Near Eastern Studies. Isn't that the same place where that fascist crackpot Daniel Pipes works? How did Ross wind up there? And will he indeed wind up as one of Hillary Clinton's top advisers?
Hey, I voted for change here . . .
Hey Blain:
Let me try to explain to you how ridiculous your post is:
1. It's widely acknowledged that the United States government's carte blanche support of Israel vis-a-vis the Palestinians is one of and if not then the main motive for Islamist hatred of the United States. This is not controversial, except to certain segments of the right wing who like to make up their own version of reality.
So in this light, I assume that Mr. Cole's wider point isn't that Israel is responsible for terrorist attacks against the U.S., but that the United States government's policy of supporting Israel, especially where it's obvious that Israel is the aggressor, that is the source. Big difference, which seems to be lost on certain ideologues with an ax to grind.
2. Pretty much everyone knows what a Neoconservative is. There's simply no need to define the term every time it's used - it would be a waste of time to do it, and if your standard was applied consistently sentences would turn into paragraphs would turn into treatises and on and on. Your "critique" is simply an impossible, cognition-destroying standard.
Apply your logic to your own post - you use the word "liberal" in what some might consider pejorative manner, but decline to define your terms. I'd say that the use of the word "liberal" has much, much more vagary surrounding it than does the word neoconservative.
3. He explained clearly what he meant by the reference to Bush, Cheney, etc. He clearly laid out how they smear people, and how Trotten's piece is of a kind.
4. The "nails in their coffin" quip applies to their ideology. Face it, it's dead. That fact that they still infect the body politic is another thing altogether, and has nothing to do with the failure of their ideas.
First, I never heard of this douchebag Totten before either. Second, the problem is not just the tactics; it's also the utter lack of morality and respect for truth behind those tactics. Postmodern Machiavellianism we might call it - the reason the left keeps falling behind is because we're not willing to stoop to this level; because we're always willing to listen to what the other side has to say and reconsider our positions, as if we were in a rational public discourse, whereas the other side is playing strategically, not worried about what is true or false but simply looking for the win. It's not about neoconservatism -- as an ideology, that's dead; but the people behind the ideology will drop it and find a new one (frankly, just like they dropped Trotskyism not that long ago).
What is really disturbing about all of this is that it has taken off on a life of its own-egged on by folks who want to see you "get yours" for not having the desired opinion about a war that does nothing to further the interests of the United States.
I voted for you-but I first became aware of this from another blogger who posted Tottens angry remarks on his very popular blog. That BTW is now being repeated on a whole host of other conservative blogs-and most of those folks have never read a word you have to say.
But that is the way the blogosphere works-people only want to hear what they want to hear I guess. I'll keep coming back here for what ever that is worth.
Vote early and vote often!
Juan,
For what it’s worth, the neocons pull the same sort of stunts, and worse, on authentic conservatives. Do a google on “M. E. Bradford” and you’ll see how they were pulling this decades ago on the true conservatives (and how the dwindling band of Old Right conservatives are still bitter about it).
One important wing of the neocons are actually, through a strange process of multiple historical metamorphoses, an offshoot of a wing of the old Trotskyist movement (see antiwar.com’s Justin Raimondo’s “Reclaiming the American Right” for details), and they still remember and use all the old Trot political tricks.
When I got involved in the anti-draft-registration movement back around 1980, I was warned by seasoned leftist activists to beware the Trots: I was told, in rather blunt terms, that they were crooked and unscrupulous. I don’t know any Trots nowadays, but the neocon playbook fits to a T what I was warned about way back then.
I wish I could share others’ optimism here that we will beat these guys just because we have the majority of the American people on our side and because we just elected a President on the basis of opposition to this war. We do have the people: it’s not just “progressives.” I know numerous “Reaganite” conservatives who are disgusted by this illegal war, the impositions on civil liberties, and the outgoing Administration in general (good examples of former Reagan officials who have denounced the madness are Paul Craig Roberts and Bruce Fein).
But the neocons are nonpareil in their ability to recover from defeats and their own self-created disasters and to thwart the desires of the American people. I’d bet on their ability to get in with the new SecState, and I’m worried that they will, in the end, dominate the new President himself.
Dave Miller in Sacramento
Does somebody know why Neocomrade M. J. Totten is supposed to matter? I see there is a Wikipedia article, but no hint in it of any credentials.
Even this coarse and illiterate keyboard could put up a better pretence of Middle East expertise than MJT, though of course it was the wrong kind of Arabic and a long time ago.
Happy days.
. . . the irony of [JC] admitting that neoconservatives will still be running circles around us for years to come right after publishing an article about the end of neo-conservatism in Salon . . . their movement is not about being right, or generating good policy, it is about mobilizing their base and keeping themselves in the spotlight . . . .
Prof. Lynch reports that the Israëli ambassador to the Court of Crawford is clueless "about being right or generating good policy" as regards Gaza, and in a pinch "mobilizing their base and keeping themselves in the spotlight" might pass for an account of what M. de Meridór’s government have been up to lately.
Perhaps it would be better to speak of the Tel Avîv pols identifying their base here in the holy Homeland, however, with special attention to the question of whether B. Husáyn Obáma is to be numbered amongst the base or not:
"Rightly to be great
Is not to stir without great argument,
But greatly to find quarrel in a straw
When honour’s at the stake."
Gaza seems decidedly straw-like to me, whereas it is very important (is it not?) for the T. A. régime to ascertain who its true and honourable friends are.
It seems quite possible that the whole circus has been staged as a sort of political litmus-paper test. Does the patient turn pink or does he turn blue when presented with, for example,
"The government and people of Israel have shown unprecedented restraint in the face of unyielding attacks with hundred of missiles and mortars fired on civilian targets by Hamas and other terrorist organizations who have made clear that their goal is the destruction of the State of Israel. No country could or would put up with this. The first obligation of every government is to protect its citizens and there can be no more justified use of force than responding to such unending terrorism." ? [*]
But God knows best. Happy days.
[*] A furqán from the Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations .
You are exactly right, Mr. Cole. Rovian tactics are still in place, fear and hatred abounds in the True Believers, and Swift Boating goes on daily.
You've got our vote, but we'd never qualify with Mr. Aylward on the military side. Even though we're true blue patriots, we are not "hooah" enough for the likes of them. Those awards have a strong bias to the conservative, we have read.
"My larger point is that Israeli atrocities in Gaza are endangering American security. "
1) Attacking missile sites and weapons sites are not "atrocities", except on the part of Hamas who plant them in schools and hospitals, or in the front yard of Christians.
2) "Endangering American security" is when Israel is not defended by America. God has a longer arm, bigger weapons, and has warned us in the Bible to cherish and protect His people and their land. Do some unbiased research, and then ask yourself how the tiny country of Israel defeated all the surrounding Arab nations? Hmmm?
Michael Totten is a douche who doesn't know Shi'ite from shinola. He is a complete joke here in Beirut.
If Totten wants it that bad, by definition, you don't want it.
I am pretty sure that Michael Totten is a Lebanese American.
I enjoy most of his reporting and that doesn't mean you can't appreciate more than one perspective.
Bill -- Thanks for reading and responding. It's something.
Lack of definition of terms is a problem for me in most contexts, because it results in sloppy usages and unnecessary disagreements. As you noticed from my use of the term "liberal." And, for the record, I don't use it as a pejorative ever -- I use it when it fits. If anybody wants to claim that Dr/Professor Cole isn't liberal, they're going to have a hard time persuading me of that.
I don't insist that the term be defined every time it's used, but it would be nice to see a relatively consensus definition identified and followed. It would also help if it wasn't used to reflexively imply that anything said or done by someone it's applied to is necessarily wrong. I don't think Dr. Cole is wrong because he's a liberal. I disagree with his reasoning in part because I don't share his unstated assumptions, because I'm not a liberal, but that doesn't make him wrong by itself. Similarly, being a neocon doesn't make Mr. Totten incorrect either, just by itself. There's been a lot more name-calling and "All I needed to hear was that he's a neocon" than there has been an identifying of any factual errors in his reporting in this thread. Guilt by association and ad hominem are logical fallacies, and they are thick in the criticism of Mr. Totten around here.
Carte-blanche support? Not exactly. The only carte-blanche point in US policy regarding Israel is that it will continue to survive. Not a small point for a country which has been in a state of war with all of its neighbors since its creation (excepting Egypt since Camp David), and has faced omnilateral attacks on multiple occasions beginning with the moment it was created.
And that is the point that the Ba'athist and Islamist despots in Syria, Iraq and Iran, and their thug squads in the militias have used as their excuse for hating the US and to justify their own raping of the people subject to them. As long as they can claim that the Zionist Entity or the Great Satan is going to try to destroy Islam, they can continue holding their own people hostage and living large in the process.
And it's far from settled that Israel is "the" aggressor here. When Hamas continues daily launching dozens of rockets at civilian targets from civilian sites through six months of "cease-fire," that's aggression, and a violation of international law (you don't use civilian centers for military purposes). Israel's attacks have without question resulted in civilian deaths. However, those civilian deaths are not the goal. When the militias attack Israel, by contrast, the purpose of the attack is civilian deaths.
And, if Israel was really trying to carry out genocide on the Palestinians (which you have not claimed, but it does come up in more extreme versions of this conversation), they've done a piss-poor job of it -- the Palestinian population has only gone up since the creation of Israel.
Oh, and your "everybody agrees with me about this except for crazy stupid right wingers, and you don't want to be one of them, do you" approach isn't going to be effective with me. There's no evidence of wide-consensus on the point, and wide-consensus is far from conclusive in establishing a truth claim. Recall the wide-consensus of the presence of WMDs in Iraq prior to the US invasion.
But thanks for reading and responding. Next time, should you do so again, it's sufficient to say "I don't agree," rather than calling what I'm saying ridiculous.
Hey guys - you know this is just blog voting right ? You take this way way too seriously. Take a chill pill.
Totten is ahead because you are a douchebag, Mr Cole.
Post a Comment
<< Home