The seat count is bad:
Party
CON 318
LAB 262
SNP 35
LD 12
DUP 10
OTH 13
Hard to see anyone but the cons pasting together a majority. Now that the words of the prophets are written on the wall, we may see another election soon. This hash has got to be settled.
This latest "trial balloon" eviscerating the Ukraine makes it extremely difficult to believe that we haven't been played by the Russians, with the aid and consent of Republicans in congress.
You are of course correct, Prof. Cole, it is an fine old propaganda technique. Bush used similar in the buildup to his Iraq conquest. Trouble is, being good technique, while suspicious, is not enough to make something true or false.
I'm taking a wait and see on this.
It's sounding like the House Benghazi committee, might reluctantly have a look-see. That reminds me of how things started in '74.
This number is not too surprising. Before Bush's Iraq conquest, he had drummed up 47-60% support for the war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq
It's just the cowards, haters, and fraidy cats, doing what they do. Every country has got them in about the same proportion. It doesn't reflect well on the Israelis, but neither does it reflect well on US, Germans, French, Russians etc.
"US Pentagon will Keep fighting in Syria until they win the Vietnam War"
That is a Lovely headline!
The seat count is bad:
Party
CON 318
LAB 262
SNP 35
LD 12
DUP 10
OTH 13
Hard to see anyone but the cons pasting together a majority. Now that the words of the prophets are written on the wall, we may see another election soon. This hash has got to be settled.
This latest "trial balloon" eviscerating the Ukraine makes it extremely difficult to believe that we haven't been played by the Russians, with the aid and consent of Republicans in congress.
The grass behind her, to the right, is a nice touch. It likely balanced the painting better when it was clean and new.
You are of course correct, Prof. Cole, it is an fine old propaganda technique. Bush used similar in the buildup to his Iraq conquest. Trouble is, being good technique, while suspicious, is not enough to make something true or false.
I'm taking a wait and see on this.
It's sounding like the House Benghazi committee, might reluctantly have a look-see. That reminds me of how things started in '74.
This number is not too surprising. Before Bush's Iraq conquest, he had drummed up 47-60% support for the war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq
It's just the cowards, haters, and fraidy cats, doing what they do. Every country has got them in about the same proportion. It doesn't reflect well on the Israelis, but neither does it reflect well on US, Germans, French, Russians etc.