CanWest and the Lobby
A kind reader alerted me to this item about the present owners of the National Post that tried to float the black psy-ops operation charging Iran with requiring religious minorities to wear "badges". This item is from before they owned the National Post, but there is no reason to think their policies have changed: The CanWest Chill: "We do not run in our newspaper Op Ed pieces that express criticism of Israel". It goes on:
' The 7 December 2001 broadcast of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's As It Happens [Real Audio link] uncovered a disturbing example of corporate and political interference in freedom of the press. The program reported on a new editorial policy directive from CanWest Global, a leading Canadian media conglomerate, that impairs readers' ability to make up their own minds about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, among other issues.
As It Happens reported that over two dozen journalists at the Montreal Gazette have pulled their bylines to protest a new policy imposed by the newspaper's owners, Southam Newspapers Inc, which is owned by CanWest Global.
The new policy requires the company's main local newspapers to run editorials written at headquarters in Winnipeg by Southam Editor-in-Chief Murdoch Davis.
Bill Marsden, an investigative reporter at the Montreal Gazette, noted that up to 156 times a year -- about three times a week -- the editorial would be imposed and that the remainder of locally-written editorials would be required to reflect the viewpoints and stances taken by the paper's corporate headquarters.
Does this influence really matter? Yes, it does. CanWest's 2000 Annual Report states that:
...[O]n July 31, CanWest announced its acquisition of all of the major Canadian newspaper and Internet assets of Hollinger Inc., including the metropolitan daily newspapers in nearly every large city across Canada and a 50% partnership interest in the National Post. We closed that transaction successfully on November 16, 2000, following completion by the Competition Bureau of its three-month review of the transaction.
The magnitude of these deals is unprecedented. Just a few months ago, the $860 million WIC purchase was the largest acquisition in the history of Canadian media. The $3.2 billion transaction to bring the Hollinger newspaper assets to CanWest remains the biggest media convergence deal ever consummated in Canada. The deal transformed CanWest into a $7.5 billion international media company and the largest Canadian publisher of daily newspapers.
Note that CanWest Global has not just limited itself to the Canadian media. It additionally owns media organisations in Ireland, Australia and New Zealand. '
Meanwhile, Michael Massing at the NRYB pulls off one of those suprise endings, where he begins by criticizing aspects of the paper, "The Israel Lobby and American Foreign Policy," then criticizes its critics, then actually fleshes out some of the mechanics whereby the lobby operates in Washington. Massing is right that the Mearsheimer and Walt paper would have been better if it had included more of these sorts of specifics.
I think around 1,600 academics have by now signed the two petitions I started protesting the smearing of Mearsheimer and Walt by organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League. Since constituent organizations of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations are lobbying Congress to cut off funding to academic programs that are not "balanced" (i.e. do not privilege the Likud Party line), academics are likely to have further things to say on this issue.

|
10 Comments:
CanWest:
The situation with CanWest is perhaps worse than your item implied. The Asper family which controls CanWest pursues an unremitting right wing political line in their newspapers. In some large cities, for instance Vancouver, the Aspers own all the major newspapers and a major radio and television share. In the newspapers, the political line is not disguised. Long opinion pieces by ex-pat David Frum (axis of evil), George Jonas (Munich), the former owner, the infamous felon Conrad Black and his wife, and other assorted right wing stylists dominate the opinion content. The surprising thing about this barrage is that it is not more effective than it is. Nobody in my little city can get home delivery of a non-CanWest paper yet opinion remains pretty evenly divided between left and right. The Citizen Kane figure, Izzy Asper, died a couple of years ago. He was a loud supporter of Israeli interests and the papers, now run by his son, continue this political line. Personally I just ignore all the opinion writing in the National Post. I'm sure many others do as well. Bogus "news" items such as the Iran clothing piece have lost their ability to surprise in Asper vehicles. Its just clumsy propaganda bought and paid for by the Aspers and their flunkies.
Why do Canadians put up with this? They should organize to pass laws forbidding this kind of massive media consolidation and domination of a news market by a single company. Corporations will try to get away with what they can. It is the people who are to blame in a democracy if they sit idly and put up with it. And, since many corporations profit from war, they could be trying to get your child killed and convince you it is for the sake of "the nation". Media consolidation is among the biggest threats to democracy in the world today, and I find everyone just supine about it.
Beneath the thin veneer of liberal tolerance and multicultural diversity which Canda sports as an image for foreign consumption as a matter of good business and product differientiation from its southern competitor, you will find that whenever any party steps outside the bounds of "civil" discourse, e.g. Native Indians, poverty activists, etc., -protest deemed "impolite", Canada has proven to be one of the more authoritarian states of the Western world. You can expect much the same authoritarian response to any who dare breech the taboo subject of Zionist influence in Canadian politics.
We do have some 'competition' laws, but they have turned out to be only as good as the people enforcing them. Over the years, there have been periods of time where enforcement was lax, and this is the time when consolidation has advanced. Of course, the Asper press also supports Harper's Conservatives, who are in power now, so you don't hear any talk in Ottawa these days about how dangerous media consolidation is.
At least we still have a CRTC (Canadian Radio and Television Commission) which has prevented right-wing domination of radio channels -- I don't think the CRTC cares who owns the stations, but if I remember the details correctly, they took the license of a radio station last year which had refused to deal with the racist opinions of one of its DJs -- though if Harper's Conservatives stay in power long enough, I would think that will change.
This just in from www.hoder.com
* Ahmadinejad is seen to be reading 'Mein Kampf' on his bus to regional meetings.
* In his iPod, covered by anti-Semite symbols and Bin Laden's pictures our sources have informed us he has the complete collection of Wagner works. One source has specifically talked about unheard tracks preformed by underground neo-Nazi bands from Westkreuz in Berlin.
In reply to Juan, the issues and the general landscape with regard to media consolidation in Canada is just as complex as it is in the United States. In a much smaller market overall, the corporations are somewhat more successful in lobbying the powers that be to allow a greater level of concentration. On the other hand, though weakened by successive federal governments public broadcasting, via the CBC, is still relatively strong in this country. Though many of us might criticize it on various levels, the fact is that its presence does tend to raise the journalistic standard.
I think there is also a fairly healthy level of diversity within Canadian media. Sure right wing voices are ever-present, but would the American counterpart of a major corporate newspaper like The Globe and Mail ever feel the need to employ among its pundits even a token "commie" like Rick Salutin? Would we expect to see the likes of an Avi Lewis or George Stromboulopolos on MSNBC? CBC Newsworld's round the clock coverage of the opening phase of "Operation Iraqi Freedom" included the requisite retired Canadian Forces generals, just like CNN and Fox, but it put them up against commentators like Gwynne Dyer. I even seem to remember Peter Mansbridge interviewing Robert Fisk at one point. Again, was there anything remotely similar on the major American networks?
Not trying to say that Canadians have anything to feel complacent or smug about on this issue. We most certainly do not. Just trying to make the point that as is often the case in this the life, the glass can be seen as either half empty or half full.
From what I've been able to tell, Juan, Canadians are no more likely to read newspapers than their American counterparts.
Those who do are usually members of the right demographic to largely agree with the National Post's line of argument. Those who don't are probably going to get their news on the television or Internet, where local restrictions are entirely academic.
In any case, considering that the National Post is essentially the Washington Times with a few less moonies, I imagine people know what to expect.
Juan, take a look at the latest Media Research Report that the Canadian Islamic Congress put together for the Canadian newspapers here.
It was in 2000 that Israel Asper and his son Leonard purchased a 50% stake in the National Post; and then a year later they bought out the rest. You can see in the "2004 Newspaper Ranking Compared to 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, and 1998" section of CIC's report how the National Post's rank in the measure of anti-Islam suddenly jumped in 2000.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/asper/ says "Asper was also known for his outspoken views on many political and social issues, especially his support of Israel. He often used his media outlets to call on the Canadian government to strengthen its support of Israel."
In the Messer's article there was this paragraph:
Mearsheimer and Walt have also used some quotes from David Ben-Gurion
badly out of context. In a discussion of Zionist policies in Palestine
prior to the creation of Israel, for example, the professors have
Ben-Gurion saying that "after the formation of a large army in the
wake of the establishment of the state, we shall abolish partition and
expand to the whole of Palestine." The clear implication, as
Dershowitz notes in his rebuttal, is that this expansion will be
accomplished by force. Yet, Dershowitz points out, Ben-Gurion was
asked in a follow-up question whether he meant to achieve this "by
force." No, he replied, it would be achieved "through mutual
understanding and Jewish-Arab agreement"—a qualifier Mearsheimer and
Walt omit.
I am surprised that a lawyer like Mr Deshowitz would make such an argument. If you want to take the argument as face value that you would think if "through mutual
understanding and Jewish-Arab agreement" Israel can "expand to the whole of Palestine." Then it would be also possible for the Israelis and Arabs to reach a "mutual understanding" for Arabs to control the whole of Palestine.
Would you suppose that Mr Dershowitz be concern with context, or accuracy of translations of the comments by Ahmadinejad, or his answers to any follow up questions.
It is worth noting that CanWest also owns/controls the Global Television Network, which is IIRC the third largest in Canada.
Post a Comment
<< Home