US Provided Real Time Intelligence for Turkish Strikes on Iraq
Ann Scott Tyson and Robin Wright of WaPo confirm from Washington sources that the US provided to the Turkish government 'real time intelligence' on Kurdish Workers Party [PKK] guerrillas holed up in Iraq. That is what Turkish Chief of Staff Yasar Buyukanit had alleged in the wake of Turkish bombing of Iraqi territory. Since the Kurdistan Regional Authority led by Massoud Barzani tacitly supports the PKK, which the US considers a terrorist organization, this provision to Ankara of intelligence from Iraq has to be going by way of Mosul and Baghdad. I.e. the Shiite al-Maliki government and perhaps Shiite Turkmen opposed to the Kurds must be involved in all this somehow. The ominous thing is that the cooperation of former prime minister Ibrahim Jaafari with Turkey on the issue of whether oil-rich Kirkuk province would be joined to the Kurdistan Regional Authority was among the causes for the collapse of his government and his replacement with Nuri al-Maliki. Al-Maliki has very little support in parliament and if the Kurdish deputies start voting against him, his government would be unlikely to survive, at least as a parliamentary regime (he could continue his current pattern of authoritarian rule by cabinet with reference to parliament in theory, though even that might become difficult for him without Kurdish support).
The danger of a US confrontation with Barzani over the PKK, and its implications for the stability of the al-Maliki government, may be among the reasons for US Secretary of State Condi Rice's surprise visit to Kirkuk. The Bush administration is underlining a recent political breakthrough in the oil-rich province, whereby the Arab representatives on the provincial council elected in January 2005 have agreed to stop their boycott of the council in return for Kurdish acquiescence in the appointment of Arabs in provincial government positions. But that agreement is fragile, and wrangling between Kurds and Arabs over other issues such as PKK provocations against neighboring Turkey could pull it apart. Kirkuk province also has a substantial Turkmen population, some large portion of which opposes incorporation of Kirkuk into the Kurdistan Regional Authority.
Labels: Iraq


6 Comments:
Maliki's government will collapse if the Kurds withdraw support. May collapse even if they kept it. But the Kurds will be excluded from any future deals due to the open hostility now from the other Iraqi groups. They are also losing US support which they have foolishly bet everything on.
Maliki may yet survive through a new option. He has been bitterly complaining that his hands are tied by the unity government deal, which is true. A possible way out is to let him pick anyone he wants for the ministries without the need for parliamentary approval. This is illegal of course, but may be allowed under some emergency set-up.
If he still fails to deliver within a short period, then he would have to resign. Right now his government lives day-by-day anyway, so he is not losing much.
On Condi's visit to Kirkuk, what about the story that the Kirkuk referendum has been delayed six months? It is that delay which is the big news for the moment. Anything to avoid a confrontation/war between Kurds and Turkmen/Sunni Arabs.
A day after the Turkish bombing, Barzani moved the Kirkuk referendum six month further out.
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=129650
Looks like he "got the message". Rice will reinforce that.
I don't see a mention of Iraq's government in the article, aside from the Parliament condemning the strikes.
Why would the Iraqi government cooperate in this, when they know it toppled Jaafari? Moreover, how would they have any information deep in Kurdistan? Does the federal government even have any offices in the region? The US has the satellites to spy on any camps. and I doubt they share it with Iraqi military. I'm skeptical
It was only a matter of time before we got into Kurd killing. Maybe we did not actually hit the bomb release button, but by pinpointing targets to the Turks, its about the same thing. If we have no problem shedding Sunni and Shiite blood, why should it be different for the Kurds?
Its interesting that the PKK's are referred to as seperatists. Seem to me that the entire Kurd universe is seperatist. Is there any indication that the inhabitants of Iraqi Kurdistan long to be a part of an integrated Iraq.
Maybe we're just outsourcing to Turkey the job of keeping the Kurds in line (with our agenda).
The Americans don't have to go through Maliki to give data to Turkey or allow overflight rights.
I'm sure Maliki found out about this US assistance around when you found out.
Turkey's military is trying to rehabilitate the image of the US in Turkey's popular mind by disclosing this openly. This is a little and it is late.
The Kurdish popular mind turns against the US to some degree because of this, but what is the Kurdish alternative?
Post a Comment
<< Home