2000 Georgian Troops Leaving;
Huge Blast at Tal Afar Kills 21;
Arab-Kurdish Tensions in Kirkuk;
Mahdi Army to Disarm if US Leaves
A huge bomb blast in the northern Turkmen city of Tal Afar killed 21 and wounded 70 on Friday. Tal Afar has been taken over by Shiite Turkmen, after having been dominated in the Saddam period by Sunnis, so there are a lot of Sunnis who want revenge. It also has Turkmen-Kurdish tensions, which are raging in northern Iraq these days because of the Kirkuk crisis (see below).
In the wake of the outbreak of the Russian-Georgian War over Ossetia, Georgia wants to withdraw the 2,000 troops it has in Iraq. These troops appear to have been based in Diyala or Wasit provinces, where they have been preventing Shiite militiamen from smuggling arms in from Iran. Although the US military is playing down the impact of their withdrawal, it seems to me significant. The Iraqi army certainly could not be counted on to take up their work, since so much of it was recruited from Shiite militias. The US would have to divert 2,000 men to this dangerous task (and it is intrinsically dangerous to have US troops directly on the Iranian border). The Georgians beefed up their presence because they are trying to join NATO; from a Russian point of view this development is highly undesirable, which is part of the point of the fighting over Ossetia.
All this is not to mention that a US airlift of 2000 Georgian troops to fight Russian ones at this juncture does not look friendly to Moscow.
McClatchy reports that Sayyid Muqtada al-Sadr pledged Friday to disband his Mahdi Army militia if the government of Nuri al-Maliki succeeded in obtaining a timetable for US troop withdrawal from Iraq.
Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that Salah al-Ubaidi, a spokesman for the Sadr Movement, said Friday that the Sadrists will dissolve the Mahdi Army if US troops begin withdrawing in accordance with a timetable. But al-Ubaidi, who read a statement before Friday prayers at the Kufa Mosque, affirmed that the Movement would reverse its decision if the US forces reneged on their intention to withdraw. He also pledged that the "resistance" would not stop until the American forces had left Iraq (though apparently it would not be a violent resistance as long as American forces were in the process of drawing down).
On another front, al-Hayat says, Iraqi members of parliament were open about their apprehensions over the tense situation in Kirkuk after the visit to that city of Kurdistan President Massoud Barzani and his renewed threat to annex it to the Kurdistan Regional Authority in accordance with the resolution passed by the Kurdish majority on city's governing council a few weeks ago at a time when Arab and Turkman representatives were boycotting the sessions. (The resolution was not viewed as binding by Iraqi legal experts). During Barzani's visit on Friday, he met with local officials and called for an open dialogue to end the dispute over Kirkuk's identity. He warned that "Those who maintain that article 140 of the Iraqi constitution is dead are instigating public unrest." Article 140 called for a referendum to be held in Kirkuk Province by the end of 2006 on whether the province would join the Kurdistan confederacy. Since it is widely recognized that in the meantime the Kurdish forces have brought very large numbers of Kurds into the province, such that they are probably a majority, however, all the referendum would establish in the eyes of Arabs and Turkmen would be that the Kurds had stolen the vote.
NPR reports on the opening of the airport near the Shiite holy city of Najaf and that city's aspirations to become the capital of southern Iraq. This report is searching and intelligent, and reminds us how much we need NPR.
Antiwar.com summarizes Iraqi political violence on Friday.
Labels: Iraq


8 Comments:
Dear Professor Cole
Let us keep an eye on the oil price for a few days.
Sakashvili will not be popular if he reverses the recent decline in prices by what the European newspapers are referring to as a rash and risky gamble.
Thank all the Gods the irresponsible beggars aren't Nato Members.
You write: This report is searching and intelligent, and reminds us how much we need NPR.
I have to beg to differ. I've been blogging on NPR news for over two years now and one decent story does not redeem its generally center-right stance. I read Informed Comment early in the morning every day, and then listen to NPR; the experience is like hearing news from two different planets. NPR has a distinctly pro-Pentagon angle in its Iraq coverage: praising the surge, not covering the air war, reporting US military press releases as fact, using lowest numbers for civilians killed, spinning the refugee crisis or not covering it at all, etc.
The story you cite is a tiny glimpse of what NPR should be. I'd recommend listeners to pressure their local NPR affiliate stations to cut back/drop NPR news shows or at least to improve the diversity and substance of news by adding such offerings as Democracy Now, Alternative Radio, Free Speech Radio, etc.
Did the US Prep Georgia for War with Russia?
Note troops in photo are wearing US BDUs and the canteen covers are labeled "US".
wonder if that will piss off the Russians?
and didn't the Germans piss off the Russians awhile back? How did that turn out?
one has to wonder why cheney / rumsfeld thought that pissing off the Russians was a good / smart idea.
and look at the mess that cheney / rumsfeld has created in Iraq/ Middle East and Afghanistan / Pakistan. Why in the world the usa mainstream media thinks that these klowns are 'statesmen' or 'global strategists' is beyond me.
and what about the 1,000 - 2,000 military 'advisors' that the usa has currently in Georgia? will they get sucked in like the 'advisors' did in South VietNam? and we know how that turned out.
jeebus. i don't know whether to just stop reading the news and go whistling in the dark or what. gd.
NPR = right wing.
-------------------
Re. Georgia: Georgia is a US Proxy and reportedly is being supported in its attack on Russia by 1000 Israeli troops (also US proxies). And yes, this is a direct attack on Russia, because Russians were stationed in the conflict area as peacekeepers. It is an attack on Russia by the same US/EU block that is not claiming to be peacemakers. Yet they won't agree to the UN resolution Russia wants that calls for cessation of arms on both sides.
This is about gas. This is about encirclement of Russia. This is about lighting the fuse for the Third World War so desired by the 'idiots' in the EU and the US administration. This is about a supposed armada reportedly steaming towards Iran. This is about the US WANTING troops on Iran's border.
But, of course, as we all know, in Juan Cole's version of reality, yesmen like Gates and Mullen will keep us from war. Thank goodness. Let's all just close our eyes, like our beloved Juan, and just believe.
I believe in Gates. I believe in Mullen.
I wonder if Fallon believed in Gates and Mullen?
NPR = National Pentagon Radio
PBS = Pentagon Broadcasting Service
it is really unfortunate that these two public entities have been turned into propaganda arms of the republican party.
On Najaf story I like to point out that the story leaves out a key fact. Najaf's economy is prospering because it of its trade (goods and pilgrims) with Iran. After all, the passengers to the new airport are going to be mainly Iranians pilgrims.
It seems that even when NPR does a seemingly decent story, it can't shake the sentiment that is captured here: NPR Check
I thought NPR was changing its name to National Pentagon Radio, given the fact that the overall tone and content of their news broadcasts run parallel to the Pentagon narrative.
ref : “The US would have to divert 2,000 men to this dangerous task (and it is intrinsically dangerous to have US troops directly on the Iranian border).”
it is ‘intrinsically dangerous’ for US troops to be anywhere other than behind the blast walls of their Green Zones, or hunkered down in the bunkers of their Forward Operating Bases ~ Which is why they have been / are now huddled in an entirely defensive posture, save for that hideous Russian Roulette game of statistical attrition known as "combat patrols" or "convoy duties", while the staff officers at the Pentagon have gone all AirWar haywire on us.
At some point, one would think that candidate Obama would just come out and say something to the effect of : “You know, Senator, that's the real difference between you and me: I don't want to just keep hangin' around Baghdad, wasting our fine Infantry and Assault Troops as dumbed-down Security Guards and ‘Peace Keepers’; I want to go after the bastards who attacked us on 9/11!”
I say enough of this Republican "stay the course" stasis nonsense, and this PNAC neo-con chickenhawk crap! We have not yet begun to fight the right fight, and everybody knows it save the President himself, who remains utterly clueless ~ and, unlike the American people, themselves ~ I daresay casualty - cowardly as a War Leader.
ref : “Churchill's furious description of WWII General Mark Clark: "Instead of hurling a wildcat onto the shore, all we got was a stranded whale!"”
Good Grief! If the Americans did manage to put a real Commander -In- Chief in there, the first thing these political staff officers like General Petraeus would probably do is pee themselves. Get on with it, or get the hell out of the way, Senator McCain: brave American Men & Women are dying every day, while you dilly-dally with this adolescent, Paris Hilton nonsense, doing nothing about it.
Post a Comment
<< Home