Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Day of Mourning, Protests, Called by Mousavi on Thursday

Mir-Hosain Mousavi, who maintains he won last Friday's presidential election despite official assertions that he lost 2 to 1 to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is calling for another rally Thursday, this time in part to honor the persons killed by hardliners or security forces in the course of previous demonstrations.

Mourning the martyr is as central to Iranian Shiite religious culture as it was to strains of medieval Catholicism in Europe, and Mousavi's camp is tapping into a powerful set of images and myths here. The archetypal Shiite martyr is Imam Husayn, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, who championed oppressed Muslims in Iraq and was cut down by the then Umayyad Muslim Empire. Recognition that a Muslim state might commit the ultimate in sacrilege by beheading a person who had been dandled on the Prophet's knee has imbued modern political Shiism with a distrust of the state. When Husayn's head was brought to the Umayyad caliph Yazid and deposited before his throne, older companions of the Prophet are said to have wept and remarked, "I saw the Prophet's lips on those cheeks." Shiites ritually march, flagellate, and chant in honor of the martyred Imam or divinely-appointed leader.

Today's protesters are wearing green, which symbolizes Mousavi's descent from the Prophet Muhammad. (Mousavi's family name refers to the Seventh Imam (descendant of the Prophet with claims to divine knowledge), Musa Kazim, whose tomb is in Kazimiya, north Baghdad. Sayyid families, those claiming descent from the Prophet, often take one of the Imams' names as a family name to honor them, though of course they are also claiming descent from the previous Imams right back to the Prophet.) The repertoires of protest the reformists are using echo those of the 1978-79 Islamic Revolution-- they are chanting "God is Great," mourning pious fallen martyrs, etc.-- another sign that this movement is not just alienated secularized elites.

But now Mousavi's his supporters are also sporting black ribbons to indicate that they are in mourning for the fallen. Typically, the dead will be commemorated again at one month and at 40 days. In 1978 such demonstrations for those killed in previous demonstrations grew in size all through the year, till they reached an alleged million in the streets of Tehran. Since the reformists are already claiming Monday's rally was a million, you wonder where things will go from here.

The regime's attempt to paint the protesters as nothing more than US intelligence agents underlines how wise President Obama has been not to insert himself forcefully into the situation in Iran. The reformers and the hard liners are not stable groupings. The core of each is competing for the allegiance of the general Iranian public. If the reformers can convince most Iranians of the justice of their cause, they will swing behind the opposition. If the hard liners can convince the public that the reformers are nothing more than cat's paws of a grasping, imperialist West-- i.e. that they are Ahmad Chalabis trying to bring Iran foreign occupation so as to get power themselves-- then the reformists will be crushed. Iranians value national independence above all, having suffered with a CIA-installed goverment for decades in the mid-twentieth century.

The prescriptions of John McCain and Faux Cable news for muscular US diplomacy at this point are tone deaf to Iranian realities and would backfire big time, harming both the reform cause and US interests. Anyway, after the basket case to which the US Republican Party reduced Iraq, no one in the global South is likely to want them meddling in their internal affairs.

Reports are streaming in of the arrest of over a hundred opposition figures and of hard line militia men following protesters home and breaking into their homes to terrorize them. See e.g., Basij paramilitary forces terrorize residential complex. The Basij militiamen are said to be afraid to come out in numbers during the opposition demonstrations, but sneak around at night to trail protesters and harass or arrest them.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had met Tuesday morning with the representatives of all four presidential candidates, urging them to make up but continuing to insist that Ahmadinejad was the winner by 24 million to 14 million votes. He portrayed the massive post-election demonstrations and charges of ballot fraud as a minor tiff.

Gary Sick wonders if Khamenei really is the supreme leader any more, and hints that the hard line tack of stealing the election was directed by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, the country's religious national guard.

Reports are coming in from Iran that allege that the regime is tracking down and destroying satellite dishes, using helicopters for aerial surveillance of neighborhoods and Basij, the right wing militia (sort of like Mussolini's Black Shirts) to do the breaking and entering. Kindly neighbors who have tried to warn suspected satellite dish owners that the militiamen were coming have sometimes reportedly themselves been arrested.

SF Techie helps Iranian protests.


End/ (Not Continued)

16 Comments:

At 5:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Basij, and others, have been terrorizing the public for decades anyway so the tactic is already a blunt instrument.

Moreover, the sheer numbers of the protesters makes it impossible for the Basij to win, and sooner or later will turn the tables on the Basij, resembling the collapse of the Mahdi Army in Iraq.

 
At 5:57 AM, Anonymous Behnam said...

You state that Mousavi has called for "another rally" on Thursday.

Not correct. He has asked for gatherings in mosques to mourn the victims. If everybody prays in their local mosque, that's not going to be much of a rally.

His official web site is here:

http://www.ghalamnews.ir/

It's better to go to the source rather than rely news agencies. Reporters invariably massage the facts.

In fact, he did not even call for the gigantic rally the other day from the Revolution Square to the Freedom Square, nor for the smaller rally in Vali Asr Square yesterday.

In his official site, he said the (first) rally was canceled because there was no official permit for it. Karrubi's aid Abtahi noted that Mousavi and Karrubi went there only to ensure that if anybody showed up, they would be calm (and presumably disperse peacefully).

Whether he's "unofficially" organizing rallies I'm not sure. It's possible gatherings in mosques is code for public demonstrations. But, publicly, he is not going on record calling for rallies that lack the state's permission.

 
At 7:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The people can do what Obama will not.

Imagine people marching in Buenos Aires, Tienanmen Square and in front of the White House with signs "Where's Irans Vote?"

This would help.

Juan Cole can help make it happen.

Obama can help too, in one way or another.

 
At 9:46 AM, Blogger Mark said...

I've been glued to this, even changing my Facebook location to Tehran in support. What an amazing time - change is good!

 
At 11:50 AM, Blogger quellcrist falconer said...

Also Dr. Cole, the clan structure and bloodlines. Blood feuds can last for hundreds of years.
That is why we see references to "your children", "children of the revolution" in Sayeed Montazeri's religious instructions to the army and police, and why the baseej are obscurring the true names of the slain.

 
At 2:40 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

ref : “Mourning the martyr is as central to Iranian Shi'ite religious culture as it was to strains of medieval Catholicism in Europe... Yes, it's all so romantic ~ this "Prague Spring" redux in Tehran 2K9 fuelled by Twitter and Flickr ~ as those few, urbane Iranians come to grips with the reality that hey, THEY are far and away out-numbered and out-gunned, and perhaps most insulting of all: un-necessary, even expendable insofar as The Islamic Republic of Iran is concerned. Theirs is a chilling theocracy, one which will persist, imho: as this anti-humanist, fundamentalist (i daresay, tribal era vestige of individual human-values, not) Theocracy, irregardless of their VOTE... "Where is my vote?" seems to US incredibly naive: did we, Americans really think that we had an anti-war VOTE?? nothing changes: $106 billion USD WAR funding bill pushed by DEMOCRATS. What's new, then? It's not like all these enlightened Iranian men and women did not already know how bizarre their "Islamic Republic", with it's weird "council of mullahs", etc. appeared to everybody else (with the possible, ironic exception of ISRAEL, that "Jewish State" theocracy being a kind of Judaic reflection of all these Islamic State models of ersatz democracy in the Middle East). The real martyr being buried today is this glimpse of THEM; this reality that an urbane IRAN itself actually exists ~ Hello! Do you come here often? ~ for beginning today, this fragile, tiny slice of news cycle is ending : nothing changes, New Year's Day. In this regard, at least, you are not alone, mes cher amis.

 
At 2:46 PM, Anonymous Thomas said...

Is the Lebanese Hezbollah in Iran helping to suppress demonstrations? Is there evidence? What is your take, Prof. Cole?

I have seen claims on many web sites, but no proof. I have seen these critiques of the claims:

Lebanon's Hezbollah in Iran to Suppress Protests?

Abu Muqawama 1

Abu Muqawama 2

 
At 3:27 PM, Anonymous Tony said...

I'm sure you're right that strong, vocal U.S. support for the demonstrators would harm the reformists' cause in Iran, but I don't think a neoconservative would call that "backfiring," since their goal is doubtless still to scrounge up a causus belli and somehow get another war going.

 
At 4:58 PM, Blogger James-Speaks said...

"The regime's attempt to paint the protesters as nothing more than US intelligence agents underlines how wise President Obama has been not to insert himself forcefully into the situation in Iran."

Wise indeed. Part of his campaign rhetoric was to seek talks with the leaders in Iran without setting pre-conditions for those talks. He can now talk with Mahmoud Amadinejad without implicitly recognizing him as the lawful victor, he can talk with whomever succeeds him without the baggage of former position, and he can carry this credibility to other nations as well.

Obama's positions, his public positions, represent careful measures to restore the diplomatic posture previously ruined by the childish Bush, the pugnacious Dick Cheney, the arrogant Rumsfeld, and the psychoambiguislymultivalent Condie Rice.

 
At 6:08 PM, Anonymous Agent Provocateur said...

I have been surprised by the comments of numerous pundits and journalists. They naively attribute or link the events of the last 6 days to the ´wisdom´ of Obama.

Obviously, change in America echoed (a bit) in Iran.

Nevertheless, I think that the democratization of Irak, albeit messy, bloody and frustrating has had a much bigger impact.

The fact that in Irak the elections were free and fair (a fact rarely stressed in our medias) was a great example for the rest of the region and to Iran in particular. The Shiites in Irak could trust the results. No small thing apparently...

So, instead of giving undeserved congratulations to Obama and his ´wisdom´, perhaps we should think the unthinkable: Bush and the neo-cons were somewhat right...

Just an idea...

 
At 6:32 PM, Anonymous Thomas said...

MonsieurGonzo's jumbled comment is a perfect example of why, unfortunately, academics have such a negative reputation when it comes to commenting on world events. It's an unfortunate stereotype that makes public debate poorer....yet, clearly sometimes it understandable.

 
At 7:05 PM, Blogger neroden@gmail said...

I read a suggestion that although there were likely a very small number of foreign fighters joining the basij -- it was most likely that the "Lebanese Hezbollah" angle was being played up so that people beaten by the basij and people in the basij could reconcile and save face later, rather than starting blood feuds.

 
At 7:59 PM, Blogger hans wehr said...

Thank you, Prof. Cole, for this very insightful post. I deeply appreciate your historical and religious insight, which is what sets your postings apart from those of other bloggers. Please, continue to enlighten your less learned readers with more of the same.

 
At 8:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the most amazing blog, thanks, Professor Cole.

One question:

Ahmadinejad said:

"He went a red light and got a ticket" or something to that extent on the real victor of the election.

How come this quote is not shared? This is insulting to the election. Am I missing something here?

 
At 8:04 PM, Blogger Lucas Mass said...

Speaking of symbolism: I noticed Zahra Rahnavard, Mousavi's wife, carrying a rose at one of the initial protests and couldn't help but wonder whether this was itself a complex symbol. The rose is a prominent image in classical Persian poetry, and as such makes a good symbol of the cultured, humanist side of the Iranian cultural divide brought into sharp relief since the election. Then, of course, there's the rose's association with the 2003 soft revolution in Georgia. Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but Iran certainly does have a strong tradition of the use of symbols for social commentary, critique, and upheaval. This may have been Zahra Rahnavard's attempt to invest a piece of classical Iranian iconography with new revolutionary meaning.

 
At 2:21 AM, Anonymous Behnam said...

To Lucas Mass:

The rose is a sign of lack of hostility. The point is, "We're peaceful. We're your friends." Hence, "Don't attack us."

During the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Islamist demonstrators would give roses to the Shah's troops.

No need to delve into classical Persian poetry, the Georgian revolution, etc. It's all much simpler than that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home