Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, April 07, 2007

Chlorine Truck Bomb Kills 30, Wounds 100;
Rumayla Pipeline Near Basra Bombed;
Assault on Mahdi Army in Diwaniya


Alissa J. Rubin of the NYT reports that a chlorine truck bomb in Ramadi killed 30, including women and children, on Friday, and sent about 100 persons to the hospital with shrapnel wounds or breathing problems.

In the Shiite south, US and Iraqi troops conducted a campaign in Diwaniya against the Mahdi Army militia, which has fought several engagements against local police. The police in Diwaniya include many elements of the Badr Corps of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq. Badr is a rival of the Mahdi Army. It has been alleged that the Mahdi Army in Diwaniya was not under the control of young cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, and was ignoring his orders in favor of local rogue leaders. Iraqslogger has more.

With reference to operation 'Black Eagle' in Diwaniya, AFP notes: "Bleichwehl said troops, facing scattered resistance, discovered a factory that produced “explosively formed penetrators” (EFPs), a particularly deadly type of explosive that can destroy a main battle tank and several weapons caches."

All this time, the US Pentagon has been maintaining that EFPs had to be imported from Iran and could not be produced in Iraq. But voila, an Iraqi EFP factory. One of the key components, which is difficult to mill, is routinely used in oil field technology, and lots of Iraqis know how to make it.

Police found 11 bodies in Baghdad, and four in Tal Afar, according to Reuters, which reports a number of bombings and assassinations bombardments in Baghdad, Kirkuk and elsewhere. McClatchy reports an even great range of violent incidents on Friday, including several mortar attacks in Baghdad.

Among the most significant was an attack I haven't seen mentioned elsewhere: "5 p.m. yesterday (Thursday), the Rumayla oil pipeline 50 km west of Basra has been damaged by a bomb."

A Rumayla oil pipeline was damaged by a bomb!? Rumayla to my knowledge hasn't suffered much from pipeline sabotage. Oil has been smuggled from it, yes. Militias and tribes conduct turf wars over the smuggling rights. But just blowing it up? That would be counterproductive for smuggling. The action suggests that one of the competing smuggling mafias or militias has been successfully frozen out of the action. In that case, they lose nothing if they blow the pipeline up, and they harm their rivals.

The Rumayla fields have 500 wellheads and produce most of the 1.8 million barrels a day of petroleum that currently support the Iraqi economy. The northern Kirkuk fields most often cannot export at all, because the pipeline to Ceyhan in Turkey constantly gets blown up by Sunni Arab guerrillas. If the Rumayla pipelines start being routinely targeted by Shiite militiamen in the south, it might spell the end of the Iraqi government of Nuri al-Maliki. It is not as if the government takes in much revenue from taxes, or has any great prospect of doing so. This pipeline bombing has been little noticed, but it is very important if it signals the beginning of a series of such attacks.

In a canny move, the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Friday offered pensions to high-ranking military officers in the former Baath regime. A wise policy, though possibly too little too late. Much of the trouble in Iraq is being caused by these very officers, though it gets blamed on "al-Qaeda" in the Western press. If the Baath officers really could be mollified, it would have a big impact on whether Iraq can return to stability. Officers at the rank of major or below have the option of joining the new Iraqi army.

Labels:

6 Comments:

At 6:07 AM, Blogger Nick Valvo said...

In RE EFPs:

Perhaps I'm a conspiracy theorist, but is it possible that the acknowledgment that EFPs could be made in Iraq was part of some back room deal to get the British hostages released?

 
At 8:38 AM, Blogger gandhi said...

Playing to his base, Dick Cheney today spat out a whole mouthful of lies about Abu Al Zarqawi, including this one:

"He's the guy who arranged the bombing of the Samarra Mosque that precipitated the sectarian violence between Shia and Sunni."

Why would Cheney say such a thing? Yes, it's fair to say that the Samarra Mosque bombing was the tipping point that led to civil war. It was certainly a brilliant and daring piece of strategy from somebody who wanted civil war. But who did it...???

At the time, I said that this was a US PysOps job, and I have seen nothing since to dissuade me. Locals said US forces were unusually active in the area that night. Anyone who knew about Honduran death squads would know about playing your enemies off against one another. The Bush administration is stacked with such people, and their main man in Baghdad was right in the thick of Iran-Contra (as was George H. W. Bush and his boyz).

But why would Cheney casually try to pin this major operation (the logistics were professional) on Al Zarqawi?

If he has hard evidence to the fact, why would he not have revealed it long ago? If he has no evidence, why make up such a thing, unless... he is trying to cover up his own involvement?

Sure, he is playing to his base, trying to muddy the waters, giving the stoopid Bush-loving dawgs a bone to chew on. But such big lies do not slip off the tongue so easily unless they have been carefully rehearsed.

Personally, I think the US military operation in Iraq has been run by the same bloody US murderers who brought us the Iran-Contra scandal, using the same blood-thirsty death squad tactics, and I believe that this is the main reason why Iraq's morgues are still seeing up to 100 tortured corpses every day.

Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat their mistakes.

PS: Dan Froomkin and TPM have more on Cheney's latest brain-dump.

 
At 9:19 AM, Blogger johnMccutchen said...

Iraq 101 Pop Quiz
Three Guesses, First Two Don't Count

Is there any truth to 'the enemy would follow us here?'

By William Douglas
McClatchy Newspapers

 
At 9:52 AM, Blogger Syrian Nationalist Party said...

"....that a chlorine truck bomb in Ramadi killed 30, including women and children......"

One wonders why the supply, distribution and sales of Chlorine is not yet regulated after the 100th truck bomb using this chemical.

How many Chemical plants left in Iraq that produces this material that escaped Rumsfeld shock and awe campaign. I guess water treatment plant and Baby milk formula was higher priority to bomb than Chlorine plants.

It is obvious that rag of militants could not manage to purchase a truck full of Chlorine and drive it around unless they have some security backing and clearance.

 
At 2:50 PM, Blogger Alamaine said...

http://tinyurl.com/2swlna

Iraqis Wish to Put up Saddam's Statue

The following URL:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&
;cid=1175947737415&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

http://tinyurl.com/2swlna

 
At 3:02 AM, Blogger One Salient Oversight said...

Chlorine is a common chemical used for water treatment.

It is also an oxidant, which means that it can be used to augment explosive devices. Ammonium nitrate, an oxidant, was used in the Oklahoma bombing.

I think the insurgents are using the chlorine to augment their bombings, which would either increase the explosive force or require less ordinance to create the same effects.

The gaseous result of the chlorine is thus a 'happy' side-effect (happy for the bombers)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home