Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Right-Zionists try to Silence Walt at the University of Montana

Richard Drake, chair of the History Department at the University of Montana, describes what it is like to invite Stephen Walt, a respected political scientist at Harvard University and author of a best-selling book on the Israel lobby, to lecture on campus. The techniques of smearing and pressure politics deployed against his appearance can only be described as a form of Zionist-fascism (whether deriving from Christian Zionists or Jewish ones), which is a much more potent danger to open intellectual inquiry in the United States than is usually realized.

At Walt's own university, Harvard, there have been a number of disinvitees-- academics asked to speak and who then saw the invitation withdrawn, apparently on grounds of disagreeing with Alan Dershowitz.

See also Elliot Colla's article at the Chronicle of Higher Education on how the Likudnik "David Project" and a Hillel Center rabbi attempted to interfere with the holding of a conference on threats to academic freedom, held at Brown University last May!

I hope academics all around the country will step up to thwart this dangerous attempt at silencing views not approved by the Right-Zionists (i.e. people who would vote for Bibi Netanyahu if they lived in Israel, and who think they have the right to decide who the chair of the history department at the University of Montana should be and who that chair can invite to speak on campus).

Some of the policing of thought, of course, is by Right-Zionists against liberal Jews, a form of anti-Semitism that seeks to brand other Jews as unpatriotic. Tony Karon argues that this ploy is running out of steam.

Norman Finkelstein reflects on his recent travails and seems suprisingly optimistic (essentially agreeing with Karon). (For our Committee on Academic Freedom letter on the Finkelstein denial of tenure, see this link.)

And see George Bisharat's Op-ed in the Baltimore Sun: "Two hundred thousand Palestinian children began school in the Gaza Strip this month without a full complement of textbooks. Why? Because Israel, which maintains a stranglehold over this small strip of land along the Mediterranean even after withdrawing its settlers from there in 2005, considers paper, ink and binding materials not to be "fundamental humanitarian needs."

Gaza is the worst outcome of Western colonialism anywhere in the world outside the Belgian Congo.

12 Comments:

At 7:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just read that the formerly members-only New York Times is going public on Wednesday.

Evidently the business manager can read the writing on the wall.

But the story will not be told in the former newspaper of record.

 
At 9:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Moran Upsets Jewish Groups Again

US House Democrat Said Pro-Israel Lobby Promoted War

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/14/AR2007091402171.html

Jim Moran's Tiresome Attack / Apology Routine

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/rawfisher/2007/09/jim_moran_mouthing_off_again.html

the blogger gets RIPPED in the Comments LOL

Jim Moran's Mouth, Again

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/14/AR2007091401542.html?sub=AR

boy does the Washington Post go BONKERS when AIPAC is criticized !!! why is that ??

is the WaPo's agenda the same as AIPAC's as the bush admin ???

 
At 10:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Gaza is the worst outcome of Western colonialism anywhere in the world outside the Belgian Congo."

Careful Juan, you may find yourself blackballed with such brazen statements....

;-)

 
At 3:09 PM, Blogger stewarjt said...

Hating or disliking Jews because they are Jews is anti-Semitic. Exposing and opposing facistic and genocidal actions by people who happen to be Jewish is not.

 
At 4:13 PM, Anonymous elblot said...

Dear Dr. Cole,

Thanks in large part to your inspirational example, I have taken it upon myself to take up this cause. I have recently made it a policy to visit every article you link to (or that I find elsewhere on the topic) and leave comments in support of the authors where appropriate.

Hopefully the fact that I am Jewish will help my credibility, but I doubt it. Anyway, thank you so much and keep up the good fight.

Regards,

elblot
Philly

 
At 5:50 PM, Blogger Chris said...

The House and Senate recently voted as part of appropriations for the "Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs" (H.R. 2764) to withhold US contributions to the UN Human Rights Council. Provisions are included for the restoration of those funds based on certain actions by the President.

In the Senate version of that bill Israel will receive at least $2.4 billion to buy US military equipment and at least $630 million to purchase military equipment made in Israel. Also $40 million was appropriated for re-settling refugee's in Israel, even though Israel recently deported a lot of refugee's from Sudan to Egypt.

No repayment is required on any of these funds even though Israel provides healthcare for all it's citizens and has a rapidly-growing high-tech economy. However reportedly Israel has under-funded their defense needs so Congress decided we had to remedy that.

Louis Arbour, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, was recently on the TV program "Democracy Now" to explain Israel's alleged war crimes when it attacked Lebanon and emphasized those in command could be held personally responsible. However as usual Congress could care less about Louis Arbour's findings on war crimes by Israel. The cluster bombs dumped in South Lebanon, which are now maiming and killing Lebanese civilians, were provided using US military aid and as were possibly the jet aircraft used to strafe and bomb civilians.

 
At 8:16 PM, Blogger Chris said...

As to Juan's description of Christian "Zionists": The problem is Christian fundamentalists seem to be exposed to a lot of pro-Israel propaganda and the need to keep Jerusalem under Israeli control. For example Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN), the largest US-based Christian broadcasting network, runs the pro-Israel TV series called “Against All Odds". TBN's description of the series includes "supernatural phenomenon which birthed and preserved modern Israel": http://www.tbn.org/index.php/2/4/p/610.html

I don't know who is behind this pro-Israel propaganda, but it's in books as well. Then they expect you to "debate" them on the subject. Also check out some of reviews of the DVD of what is now simply called "Against All Odds" at Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/Against-All-Odds-Survives-Complete/dp/B000GNOGDI

 
At 11:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Gaza is the worst outcome of Western colonialism anywhere in the world outside the Belgian Congo."

I think Iraq might be a contender.
Susan

 
At 4:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Gaza is the worst outcome of Western colonialism anywhere in the world outside the Belgian Congo."

If you mean self rule by a bunch of fascist fanatics - then I quite agree. If, as it appears, you are supporting Hamas as opposed to the government on the West Bank then you are on the wrong side.

 
At 5:38 PM, Anonymous outraged conciousness said...

Hating or disliking Jews because they are Jews is anti-Semitic.

Exposing and opposing fascistic and genocidal actions by people who happen to be Jewish is not.

Falsly accuse Jews in fascistic and genocidal actions when there are none such in an attempt to smear and dehumanize, while applying double standards, is Antisemitic.

 
At 5:53 AM, Blogger BadTux said...

People who accuse Hamas of being "fascist fanatics" are boring. Fascists don't believe in welfare or social programs, while the reason Hamas won the last Palestinian Authority elections was because of their extensive welfare and social services programs. Like them or not, Hamas are the lawfully elected government of Bantustan oops the Palestinian Authority. If the majority of the Bantu oops Palestinians support Hamas, it should be no business of South Africa oops Israel. The Bantu oops Palestinians have the right to vote for who rules them only if they vote for the candidate supported by South Africa oops Israel, it seems. So much for that whole "two state solution" thingy, a "state" which is not even allowed to elect its own leaders cannot be called a real "state", it is actually just a province of whatever nation selects its leaders. Which means that the so-called "Palestinians" are actually, uhm, ISRAELIS. Hmm. Apartheid, indeed.

 
At 10:48 AM, Anonymous outraged conscience said...

Bad, Bad Mr. Cole, intellectual fraudster that you are. Engaging in censorship are we? Too afraid to have any dissenting POV shown on your pages? Shameful, dishonourable conduct it is.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home