Informed Comment Homepage

Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion

Header Right

  • Featured
  • US politics
  • Middle East
  • Environment
  • US Foreign Policy
  • Energy
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submissions

© 2025 Informed Comment

  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Member Profile

Total number of comments: 4 (since 2014-02-26 00:57:10)

GusFarmer

Showing comments 4 - 1
Page: 1

  • The Debacle of the Caliphates: Why al-Baghdadi's Grandiosity doesn't Matter
    • GusFarmer 06/30/2014 at 2:04 pm

      From what I've read, even the Mamluks & Ottomans didn't take their own caliphal control seriously. The Mamluk caliphs were completely figureheads who lived fairly plush lives at the sultans' whim, while the Ottomans only started using the title to any degree after the Russians agreed to recognize them as caliphs over the Crimean Tatars in the Treaty of Kucuk Kaynarca in 1774.
      It's plausible that ISIS is capable of establishing a radical state if the Iraqi government & others remain divided, but for them to have any semblance of caliphal authority, they'd have to occupy Mecca, and that's not likely to happen.

  • Is Russia Replacing US in Iraq?
    • GusFarmer 06/27/2014 at 10:28 am with 2 replies

      "The Soviet patronage of Baathist Iraqis lasted until the Gulf War in 1990-91."
      Last I checked, WE backed Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War throughout the 1980s. Iraq (and many of its neighbors) have been playthings for the US, USSR, and various European powers for a century-plus. That's why the region's so thoroughly screwed up.

  • US Hypocrisy on Crimean secession move: Washington Supported Break-up of Sudan, Yugoslavia, Iraq
    • GusFarmer 03/09/2014 at 1:05 pm with 1 replies

      True. Washington had no problem with Texas seceding from Mexico in the 1840s; only dispute over slavery prevented that "republic" from becoming a state more quickly afterward. That's the closest parallel I can see to the Crimea situation, but Russia has a deeper historic claim to Crimea than we did to Texas.

  • Not to Reason Why: A New Crimean "War"?
    • GusFarmer 02/25/2014 at 5:06 pm with 1 replies

      Although there are certainly potentially war-causing issues here, the WSJ's neutrality is rather suspect, given corporate America's history of imperialism and intervention all over the planet.

Showing comments 4 - 1
Page: 1

Tweet
Share
Reddit
Email

Primary Sidebar

Support Independent Journalism

Click here to donate via PayPal.

Personal checks should be made out to Juan Cole and sent to me at:

Juan Cole
P. O. Box 4218,
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2548
USA
(Remember, make the checks out to “Juan Cole” or they can’t be cashed)

STAY INFORMED

Join our newsletter to have sharp analysis delivered to your inbox every day.
Warning! Social media will not reliably deliver Informed Comment to you. They are shadowbanning news sites, especially if "controversial."
To see new IC posts, please sign up for our email Newsletter.

Social Media

Bluesky | Instagram

Popular

  • Albanese Sanctions: Marco Rubio now Acting just Like Putin, Charging Human Rights Officials
  • War Criminal Netanyahu nominates Felon Trump for the Nobel Prize
  • Why Faith Leaders are standing up to the Largest pro-Israel Christian Lobby
  • Plans to Concentrate Gaza Palestinians in Rafah Camp a Crime against Humanity
  • Solar Power outstripped all others in Europe last Month for First Time

Gaza Yet Stands


Juan Cole's New Ebook at Amazon. Click Here to Buy
__________________________

Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires



Click here to Buy Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires.

The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam


Click here to Buy The Rubaiyat.
Sign up for our newsletter

Informed Comment © 2025 All Rights Reserved