It was an RF-4E (recon variant) taking evasive action, darting in and out of Syrian airspace. Hard to justify this flight as defensive, or the shootdown a threat to a UN member state.
A fresh translation. But where Khayyam expressed lapses of bewilderment, Rumi was able to attain higher points of revelry. And that revelry, we find the highest calling.
I really don't know why you continue to peddle the "stolen" election line, Juan. You know there is persuasive evidence to the contrary. Still, you persist with this, this time in the form of a guest editorial.
What's more, you'll censor this comment.
Nevertheless, I still read your blog. About 2/3 of your blog entries I still find interesting.
How many folks, Juan included, ridiculed Khamenei for his public statement that Iran's Islamic revolution was now being echoed in places like Egypt? At least ElBaradei has the courage to state the truth.
I wouldn't call it a civil war yet. So far, I've yet to see photo/video evidence of an opposition force of greater than platoon strength. When I see evidence of the opposition employing greater than company level strength in any given area, I'll begin to consider whether this has attained the scope of civil war.
Really makes you wonder what the foreign intelligence agencies of our allies are thinking of us, Juan. They're all scrutinizing this, as well, and are quite possibly coming up with a similar if not same conclusion.
At first I considered this matter for having a Zimmermman Telegram like effect.
Now I think the nature of this is more in line with the Gleiwitz incident.
I caution that the third phase of this Libyan civil war may be concluding. However, it remains to be seen if a fourth phase to the conflict emerges and/or an Islamic republic (or Emirate) develops.
"While it is almost impossible to prove the extent of the death toll, there is growing evidence that violent elements pledging allegiance to the opposition have carried out well armed and carefully co-ordinated attacks against government troops since as long ago as April."
Really, you should be posting casualty numbers as claims, and not be so dismissive about claims of armed opposition elements. I mean, I've pointed you in the direction of video evidence. I've given you the Crooke report. And now I've given you the latest from The Telegraph.
I suggest you just be upfront and admit you're biased against supporters of the Syrian regime, in favor of opposition members which include armed elements committing lethal attacks.
But Juan, it's often a game of opportunism based upon popular perception. Look at the gargantuan profits the Western oil industry has sustained since the onset of upheaval and intervention in Libya.
I know you'll likely censor this comment, Juan (as you have in the past) but Shia experts such as Vali Nasr in his book "The Shia Revival" have detailed the Iranian extractions of many of Bahrain's Shiites. Although they do so behind closed doors, many Bahraini Shiite families actually speak Persian. That they are forced to so in underground fashion is due to the repression of the Al Khalifa dictatorship.
I bought the Arista label album with this song on it back when I was a teen in the mid 70s. I often think of the song "the revolution will not be televised."
Really sad about his later years. A few of my African-American friends have succumbed the same way.
Pouya: no mention of the public opinion polls showing Iranian support for the Islamic political establishment by a 4:1 margin? Or that four polls consistently show that Ahmadinejad actually won the 2009 election? And what about Brill's comprehensive analysis that had withstood all serious challenge in showing that the 2009 election was legitimate and Mousavi basically lied when he said it was not?
Glaring omissions.
How can you have a revolution when those that are revolutionary are but a slender minority? It didn't work in America during the years 1968-72, why should it work in Iran today? Because you want it to?
The Basij is formed around an ideology and is composed of volunteers. Nearly every city and town has this volunteer program installed.
What ideology and program do these pro-Mubarak fellows adhere to? My guess is that most of them were actually policemen wearing their civvies.
Iran's cadre of policemen (NAJA) were never withdrawn as was done in Egypt and they never appeared later in their civvies.
If you want to put forward an analogy for Iran's crowd control efforts in 2009, perhaps a better comparison would be Chicago in 1968 or Seattle in 1999.
© 2026 All Rights Reserved
It was an RF-4E (recon variant) taking evasive action, darting in and out of Syrian airspace. Hard to justify this flight as defensive, or the shootdown a threat to a UN member state.
A fresh translation. But where Khayyam expressed lapses of bewilderment, Rumi was able to attain higher points of revelry. And that revelry, we find the highest calling.
You were there, Juan? Your opinion carries added weight.
More like Assad's Vicksburg, depending on the eventual outcome of the conflict.
‘Tel Aviv Institute for Near East Policy'
lol, how appropriate.
Juan, here's the entire documentary presented in a single YouTube video:
link to youtu.be
A favorite!
Now that's funny.
Juan, I think you mean "foreign military intervention in Syria (not Iraq) could easily split up the country".
I really don't know why you continue to peddle the "stolen" election line, Juan. You know there is persuasive evidence to the contrary. Still, you persist with this, this time in the form of a guest editorial.
What's more, you'll censor this comment.
Nevertheless, I still read your blog. About 2/3 of your blog entries I still find interesting.
Juan, from the street sign attached to the building, I'm guessing that's Capp or Cypress Street at Mission.
I'll check it out in person and get the actual address for you.
Looking forward to checking it out. Thanks for posting.
Who's "we"? There's a lot of those "we" folks who are simply interested in removing that "colored guy" from the office of POTUS. Sad but true.
Juan, it's Velayat-90 (referring to the Iranian calendar year), not 80.
One of your best posts.
Egypt's ElBaradei: Liberals "decimated" in vote.
How many folks, Juan included, ridiculed Khamenei for his public statement that Iran's Islamic revolution was now being echoed in places like Egypt? At least ElBaradei has the courage to state the truth.
Is he Russian or Ukrainian? I thought he was Ukrainian.
I wouldn't call it a civil war yet. So far, I've yet to see photo/video evidence of an opposition force of greater than platoon strength. When I see evidence of the opposition employing greater than company level strength in any given area, I'll begin to consider whether this has attained the scope of civil war.
But Juan, while it may have been packaged as "jaw-jaw," the intent remained regime change.
And let's be serious about the nuclear fuel exchange, shall we? How could you possibly defend Obama's rejection of the 2010 Tehran Declaration?
Really makes you wonder what the foreign intelligence agencies of our allies are thinking of us, Juan. They're all scrutinizing this, as well, and are quite possibly coming up with a similar if not same conclusion.
At first I considered this matter for having a Zimmermman Telegram like effect.
Now I think the nature of this is more in line with the Gleiwitz incident.
Thucydides must be chuckling at us,wherever he is. Ah, the folly, the sheer hubris....
There are already signs that a fourth phase to this conflict is a real possibility.
I caution that the third phase of this Libyan civil war may be concluding. However, it remains to be seen if a fourth phase to the conflict emerges and/or an Islamic republic (or Emirate) develops.
"(Intrestingly, this tactic is similar to that used by the Green movement for democracy in Iran in 2009)"
Which was an unsuccessful hijacking of the Iranian Revolution's tactic from 1979.
LOL.
By the way, Juan, have you read "The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy" by Adam Tooze?
It's a must read.
link to books.google.com
Not surprising. Iraq is a very low key member of the resistance camp.
Juan, even The Telegraph is now admitting:
"While it is almost impossible to prove the extent of the death toll, there is growing evidence that violent elements pledging allegiance to the opposition have carried out well armed and carefully co-ordinated attacks against government troops since as long ago as April."
link to telegraph.co.uk
Really, you should be posting casualty numbers as claims, and not be so dismissive about claims of armed opposition elements. I mean, I've pointed you in the direction of video evidence. I've given you the Crooke report. And now I've given you the latest from The Telegraph.
I suggest you just be upfront and admit you're biased against supporters of the Syrian regime, in favor of opposition members which include armed elements committing lethal attacks.
But Juan, it's often a game of opportunism based upon popular perception. Look at the gargantuan profits the Western oil industry has sustained since the onset of upheaval and intervention in Libya.
I know you'll likely censor this comment, Juan (as you have in the past) but Shia experts such as Vali Nasr in his book "The Shia Revival" have detailed the Iranian extractions of many of Bahrain's Shiites. Although they do so behind closed doors, many Bahraini Shiite families actually speak Persian. That they are forced to so in underground fashion is due to the repression of the Al Khalifa dictatorship.
I bought the Arista label album with this song on it back when I was a teen in the mid 70s. I often think of the song "the revolution will not be televised."
Really sad about his later years. A few of my African-American friends have succumbed the same way.
I could not agree more wholeheartedly with the author's ultimate recommendation.
Pouya: no mention of the public opinion polls showing Iranian support for the Islamic political establishment by a 4:1 margin? Or that four polls consistently show that Ahmadinejad actually won the 2009 election? And what about Brill's comprehensive analysis that had withstood all serious challenge in showing that the 2009 election was legitimate and Mousavi basically lied when he said it was not?
Glaring omissions.
How can you have a revolution when those that are revolutionary are but a slender minority? It didn't work in America during the years 1968-72, why should it work in Iran today? Because you want it to?
Western liberalism can be a beautiful thing, Juan. I myself am a believer. But there's always been an ugly side.
The Basij is formed around an ideology and is composed of volunteers. Nearly every city and town has this volunteer program installed.
What ideology and program do these pro-Mubarak fellows adhere to? My guess is that most of them were actually policemen wearing their civvies.
Iran's cadre of policemen (NAJA) were never withdrawn as was done in Egypt and they never appeared later in their civvies.
If you want to put forward an analogy for Iran's crowd control efforts in 2009, perhaps a better comparison would be Chicago in 1968 or Seattle in 1999.