Total number of comments: 132 (since 2013-11-28 14:42:45)
Yusuf legere
Showing comments 100 - 1
Page: 2 1
Showing comments 100 - 1
Page: 2 1
Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion
Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion
Total number of comments: 132 (since 2013-11-28 14:42:45)
Showing comments 100 - 1
Page: 2 1
Showing comments 100 - 1
Page: 2 1
© 2025 All Rights Reserved
Nd yet, Oliver, Norway (or any other democratic country) is just an election away from becoming a bad example of democracy rather then a good example. The fundamental flaw with democracy is that the ones who decide have virtually no knowledge about how to solve the issues. As you are well aware, running a nation is complicated and being a good speaker or being able to run a convincing campaign does not nessisairily qualify one to be a good president or PM
Democracy doesn't really work very well at all. I find it ironic that Americans blindly support a system that has let "99%"of them down (if you trust the OWS figures, personally I would say probably 80-90% but I won't quibble). Democraticly elected governments have passed laws allowing corporations to have equality to human beings, allowing special interest groups to steer foreign and/or domestic policy as well as many other laws that do nothing positive for the masses.
Some people argue that democracy has created a lot of wealth for a lot of people. True, but so did the Islamic sharia system of the late 7th and early 8th century. I doubt the average citizen was worse off, including Christians and Jews, in that peroid then the average joe in America today.
Andrew, photosynthesis only works if plants will use the carbon dioxide. The problem is that the carbon dioxide released by the burning of modern refined petro-chemicals has atoms of certain heavy metals attached to it so plants will not use it. Whether the same is true with coal I couldn't say but for oil it's useless for plants
Couldn't have said it better myself Joe from Lowell
Interesting stats. Maybe they could call this new Arab/Jewish entity "Palistine"
That's true pabelmount. Actually Canada, I'm saddened to admit my home and native land, is more pro Zionist than even the Unlimited Supply of A**£%les.
Do you really think they are "behind the curve"? Or is it simply a matter of pragmatics, i.e. one who criticizes Israel does not get elected, and may have some mud slung at them as well.
Isn't it semantics? People are struggling for change in huge numbers and the overwhelming power of the government seems not to phase them. Maybe the Syrian uprising does not fit the criteria (x% of people under arms etc.) but in many ways it is exactly the same as a war. Call it a pajama party if you want.
IMHO we need to find a way to support the Syrian people without co-opting their struggle and leave it to them to decide what to do.
Sorry bill, but what you think you know about Islam is either outright wrong or 1/2 expressed (the female inheritance issue being 1/2 expressed), the 1/2 a mans testimony refers to issues of business and can be superseded and you are completely wrong on the divorce issue. Shariah is similar to western law in that it is evolving and is made up primarily of opinions.
Sorry, clumsy thumbs.
As I was saying moamar was a contradiction in many ways and promoting aspects of real shariah over Arab culture while otherwise working to suppress Islam was just one example of this contradiction. This is what I meant when I said many people would embrace shariah if they were unaware of its religious roots (meaning verdicts and opinions not directly related to "religion").
The only quibble I have with this post is that you confuse Arab (and other) culture with Islam. The points you made about Gazaffi allowing things, well, actually, it is Islam that promotes these things. Momar
Hahaaa, yer so right JT, a good many people would agree to shariah if it was put to them in a way that hid its Islamic roots. I'm thinking about the OWS people in particular but just the average American too
It seems that this bogeyman is a favorite tool of western leaders.
Personally, I hope Libya embraces shariah so I can emmigrate there.
Something needs to happen here in the west. Our PM, Mr. Harper recently stated that the biggest threat to Canada is "Islamization" a word I've never heard but interestingly, my phone's spelling predictor program knows very well. Ignorance about Islam is widespread and understandable when you concider the homogeneity of the MSM but I wonder if non Muslims ever think "isn't that racism?" when they read or hear some of these rediculous statements.
For a look at how SOME Muslims reacted to Harpers racism you can visit islam20questions.org
Sorry to see the Obama administration is so anxious to push this kind of neocon smear. I expected it from Netanyahu’s moll Hillary Clinton, but Obama and Biden surprise me.
Have you been paying attention lately???
"...as it is for Muslims to grasp notions of RENAISSANCE..."
Anyone else see the irony here?
How about some evidence Bill.
Bill, you are also in a "war on drugs" do you support the kiling without trial of proponents of legalization? Or suspected drug dealers? Why not just have death squads roaming around America "disappearing" users and dealers. Al Awlakie was killed because of what he said not what he did, or at least that's what I believe. You may think differently but we will never know now will we? That's the point! If you allow your government to act outside the law, you don't deserve liberty, and killing a citizen, under the circumstances Al Awlakie was killed, was outside the law.
Or small pills, as in purple micro- dot. (Just a flash back from my youth)
The ayatollah's came to power as a result of the shahs ruthlessness, not from a vacuum. It was AMERICA that installed the shah. They did this because they had (democratically elected) mossadegh assassinated.
What does the DR in your name stand for
We just had a isotope deficiency scare here a year or so ago. Are you saying Iran has a more stable source than Canada? Really, what does the DR in your name stand for anyway?
Dear doctor Cole. I think the negative tone of this piece is a psychological trick to spur your American readers on to some form of action. I fear it's too late. The vast majority of Americans will sit and cheer on the occupy wall street crowd from their living rooms and do nothing while the malignancy that is the USA sinks. And well they should
The Der Speigel article points to a lot of allegations. What has been proven? Do Americans really trust their government that much? I surely would not!! What would be wrong with trying to arrest the man, no matter how long it took. Imagine the PR coup if the US supreme court could convict one of these high level terrorists in a fair trial. Makes me think they don't really want to. The Taliban offered to hand over OBL on at least one occasion and the US declined to accept the offer. Why? Fair trials, where evidence can be presented by both sides are the only way to deal with these people.
What pisses me of is this insistence by the USG that this is about peace. It's not really, it's about justice. If there was a little more justice for the Palistinians there would be a greater chance for peace.
I really hope America's problems multiply and cause them to lose what international sway they still have because it seems apparent to me that the militarist and corporatists have won in the US and there is no repairing the damage done from the inside short of a real revolution. A revolution which would lead to another civil war due to the polarization of the American people.
(cont.) are a result of real life capitalist facts. People can afford them, so they will be built. I wish there was a way to keep the accommodations equal, even free, but it is still possible for the average person to make hajj so...
It would also be nice to save all the history, but we have our history in the sera of the prophet and the hadeeth. What is important is that people can make hajj!
You must realize that Macca is in a small valley with very little room to grow.
I've been to all three sites mentioned in the linked article. I think the wahabbi's have a valid point.
The trail to the cave on jabel Noor climbs steeply to the peak, where you can look down to the enterance to the cave. What you see there I'd very sad. Hundreds of people jostling to see the inside of the cave as if it was a religious obligation. The mountain itself is littered with what must be tens of thousands of plastic water bottles. From a historical perspective, it would be nice to see the area developed but from a religious standpoint I think it would be better to see the whole area (jabel Noor) leveled to prevent people from turning it into a place of worship.
The 5 star hotels and condos surrounding the two masjids
@Debbie. I think that stems from the capitalist system. America was built on greed and every man for himself. I think that's why there's such an aversion to health care and other aspects of the social safety net. Strange that a "Christian" nation could be so cold. I began to lose respect for the "average American" back when that guy had the "talk show" with all the fist fights and cursing. People seemed not to care that they were airing their worst side on national television just to get on national television, AND, there was an audience for them. I think its the beginning of the end for a culture when that kind of thing is considered entertainment. A bit like "The O'Riley Factor"
" may have IDEAS that conflict..."
I dont find it disturbing at all. I think it's wise for a party in the position the MB finds itself in to concider that outsiders may have das that conflict with their own. What I have read does not seem to indicate that the MB rejects Erdogan's ideas, only that they will take an Egypt first approach rather than take an outside model and use it in it's entirety.
Phil, it is unfair of you to criticize palestines neighbors for not supporting them. It has only been a few months since Tunis threw off it's oppressive yolk and Libya and Egypt are still in the process. Give them time and you will, I'm sure, see a lot of support for the Palestinians.
@Ronald. You may have been shocked because you are a westerner and as such see things through Christian-centric eyes. As a Muslim, I believe ataturk's policies were anti religion and thus I see them (his policies) as a threat to my freedom of religion. Westerners seem to think that atheism, rampant consumerism and "democracy are the be all and end all and will never understand the ME mentality until they get over themselves and realize there are other valid world views
Warren, I would suggest to you that the shia Sunni devide is rooted more in the fundamentals of the religion i.e. Shia rejection of the legitimacy of the first 3 caliphs (abu bakr, Omar and Othman may Allah be pleased with them) as well as their rejection of a'isha may Allah be pleased with her.
JOE FROM LOWELL. Are you kidding me?? Are you referring to the unidentifiable flash of colour that appears in the right top third of the screen just before the explosion?? I saw that video when it was released. Cockburn said eyewitnesses reported seeing passengers terrified faces through the windows, lol. If the powers that be want to prove us skeptics wrong, they need to offer more than microseconds flashes of UFO's (in the literal sence of the term). With all the video servelence of the pentagon, offering this video does nothing but harden a skeptics skepticism. But, I think you were being sarcastic, no?
Mostly old Russian stuff. If he had AK47s he must have gotten them in Gaza though. I say this because the IDF's evidence that the south Israel bus attackers were from gaza is that they used AK47's (apparently only available in Gaza lol)
Cockburn's 9/11 piece was full of holes. In it he alleged that there was photographic evidence of an airplane hitting the pentagon, but did not produce the picture. I for one have been looking for 10 years (or almost) and have not found this c kind ov evidence. He also cites one or two anonymous "witnesses" to support his theory. If he is a credible journalist he needs to apologize for that opinion piece and offer something that resembles real investigative work, otherwise I will judge him on that piece and concider him a hack.
Thanks JTMCPHEE, I wanted to respond to that ignorance but now, thanks to your,ore polite version, I don't have to. Cheers
It appears some in Washington also supported Ghazaffi as recently as august 20th (according to aje's recent report) would that not be considered an act of treason in the good ol' US of A?
Eid Mubarak to all Libyans, and to you prof. Cole. You have been the voice of sanity through all this and continue to be so. I live amongst a small community of Libyans and have been following this story closely since last Feb. Reports on this blog have been in almost total agreement with the ideas, attitudes and knowledge of those Libyans I have spoken to. I was offered a job in Libya and hesitated to accept and then all this mayhem happened. I was really disappointed because by a large majority, the Libyans I have met were all warm, generous and positive people and I very much wanted to experience the land that produced these amazing loving and lovable people. It seems mow that I may soon get my chance. Inshallah
Jon, just off the top of my head here is an example of your ignorance. A man dies leaving one son, one unmarried daughter. The son receives twice the inheritance of the daughter. The son is then required to provide a place for his sister to live, to feed her, pay for her education and maintain her lifestyle as close as possible to what it was when her father was living. The daughter can keep her money or spend it or give it away or any combination thereof. She is not required to spend one penny on her upkeep. THAT sir is shariah and you are welcome to look it up. I fail to see how that is an injustice to women. If you want to see how women can be treated in the west, read a book called "life with billy" or simply read the statistics on violent crime against women in the US or Canada. Your other points are equally misinformed.
Mazlum, I don't know how much you know about sharia but there's not much in that document that conflicts with Islamic legal principals. There are a few minor changes such as the right to publicly criticize could be interpreted to allow blasphemy which serves no purpose and causes problems, so it could be tweaked a bit, and the fact that you cannot separate Islam the religion from Islam the ideology because they are one and the same. I personally have no problem with that. If non muslems
Mazlum, here is an example of how an Islamic state would discriminate against other religions. When Jerusalem first fell to the Muslims the bishop of Jerusalem invited the Muslim leader (I think it was Omar or Othman) to pray at the church of the holy sepelcur (sp?). He refused because he was afraid it would signal to future hot heads that Xian houses of worship were fair game for Muslims. They are not!
So what if an Islamic republic emerges, are you Libyan? If not, frankly it's none of your business what the Libyan people decide they want for a government. No one in there right mind can say "democracy" is faultless, or communism or any other ism that's been tried. I say if the Libyan people want an Islamic republic, good fo them and good fir the rest of the world too
Just want to add another voice to Ann's comment. Hats off to you professor Cole.
Hahaa, his speech tonight (Saturday) reminded me of a drunk in a bar. I think he's a few bricks short of a full load for sure. The Libyan guys were getting a great kick out of it.
Good observation Ron. I hadn't considered the similarities, thanks for pointing that out.
I sat for Iftar with 15 or so Libyan brothers on Saturday, and the mood was decidedly more upbeat than it has been in the past. I am so happy for them. One brother showed me google earth images of his home town and video of a nearby airbase being bombed by NATO. The optimism was palpable. They are now talking hopefully about returning home and I pray they can, although this community will miss them greatly.
I seriously doubt if prof. Cole is simply perusing MSM reports and deciding on what is true and what is not, and I tip my hat to him for allowing such an insult to be published on his own blog. Your willingness to defend the Al Assad regime, wether by omission or commission is only proof of the effectiveness of the regimes media black-out. HOWEVER, there are reports getting out, and I have personally seen footage of what is going on and have personally heard eye witness reports. There is no question that the Syrian government is murdering peaceful, unarmed protesters FULL STOP!!! I am as anti violence as the next guy, but there comes a time when even a x'ian runs out of cheeks to turn
Sorry to hijack this thread but I feel compelled to comment on your O'Riley post and comments are closed so I'm hoping you'll let me make this comment.
Some Christians ard denying the violent side of the new testament and I would like to point out that in Luke, I think 19:27 Jesus (AS) is reported to have said words to the effect of " bring me those who reject my message and slay them at my feet".
If this is metaphorical and the sword quote is metaphorical, why would he (AS) use such violent imagery considering the argument that he (AS) was strictly non-violent
Ahhh, I get it now. The Palestinians have no right to their ancestral homeland because they didn't have the foresight to see that one day outsiders would come and violently kick them off their land and use a foreign version of law to deny them their so called human rights. I guess those Palistinians are really stupid eh?
It is a good laugh that here the US is supporting the same Sunni fundamentalists that they are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Do you have some evidence of such a coalition?
I think a system where a head of state chosen by the people has unlimited power to do what has to be done within the confines of the constitution would be a good one. Kind of like a benevolent dictatorship. One restriction I would put on it though is that if a person campaigns for the post in any way he/she should be disqualified.
OMG what claptrap!! Unions created by corporations??
As far as this post being seen in the Arab world, I intend to show it to as many brothers in the Libyan/Egyptian community as I can. Maybe that's as far as it will go, but maybe not.
BTW weekends in the parts of the ME that I visited were Thursday's and Fridays, FYI.
Your comment about not compelling people to vote also makes some assumptions, (as do most of your other points). I think it is perfectly legitimate to require people to vote if they can be informed and have the option of voting "none of the above"
I do agree on one point though, you cannot separate religion and politics, not in the ME and not in the USA. FWIW, I don't see that as a problem.
Didn't get that report but I cheer it as well. One of my biggest fears for Egypt was that the IMF/WB would getting their hooks deeper into them and it is heartening to hear of this rejection 🙂
As do I Joe. This stems, IMO, from an inherent racism that says that Arabs are incapable of acting civilized (ironic coming from a Eurocentric group given that it was the Arabs that pulled we whities from the dung heap of the dark ages). Sadly, many of my Arab friends have also bought into this malarky
Joe, remember that America only came to the "assistance" of Tunis and Egypt when it became clear that the youth movements were gaining the upperhand or actually winning. When I read about the Egyptian military council dragging it's feet, arresting protesters etc, it's then that I see the American hand. Egypt has not had regime change yet, only a shake up at the top.
Why?? Are Libyans somehow incapable of creating a society based on equality?
I for one hope my brothers and sisters in Libya reject western style "democracy" and create a truly fair and just society. They certainly have the potential.
Dr. Cole; I wonder if you could comment on A. Cockburn's piece on this topic which I read on "The First Post". link to thefirstpost.co.uk
I would also appreciate your thoughts on weather or not the TNC will serve the Libyans or the IMF/ World Bank and their Ilk.
Sheeple is an apt description of the western masses. Where I work there are about 850 other employees and at least 90% of them have no idea what is going on in the ME or, probably worse, they repeat the drivel fed to them by the MSM. I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard " those people" have been fighting for centuries, like Europe was a haven for peace nics and butterflies for the past 2000 years.
A very sad, but I think engeneered situation.
I think, judging from Obama's speech last week, the US plan is to try set another neo-liberal system where the government is beholden to the multinationals. If the military maintains power, that could happen, but I think you'd then see tahrir square full again. Best case scenario is that Libya gets its house in order so it can be a source of financial aid to the ME, similar to what Venezuela has been for SA
Ted. What do you know about shariah law? I would venture to guess that the answer is next to zero except that it's a good boogyman to bring up when talking about Muslim majority areas empowering themselves.
Is it the non-predatory banking system you oppose? Or maybe the concept of greater good trumping personal aspirations? Or will you just fox news us with stories of amputated limbs and spousal abuse ( which, of course, never happens in "civilized" countries)
So, do you mean by this that you would have buried the Abu Graib photos if it had been your decision?
I agree with most of this, but not #8. Especially the point about it being in the best interest of America that OBL be tried. America being the average citizen, yes but America the political entity, maybe not so much. CNN was talking Monday night about the govt. trying to avoid "conspiracy theories" but the at sea burial is one of a few points that could have been predicted to cause alternate theories.
It's true that Muslims should be buried as soon after their death as possible, but in a case where an autopsy is required, many scholars have said it is permissible to delay the burial. As for the "not wanting to create a shrine" arguement, poppycock!
Sadly, the truth about OBL may never be known, but to trust sources in the US govt. for information is to accept doublespeak as truth.
I think it's poor thinking to base a question on a flawed premise. Communities can be extremely happy about events that do not directly affect them, I've seen it.
Very good point sister.
There is absolutely no basis for the claim that "islamists" ( I despise that term) have now or will have any sway in the future of Libya. Qazaffi is ideologically opposed to "radical Islam" and the Libyan population is, by and large Muslim in the true sense of the word and thus will have nothing to do with any group that will attempt to use Islamic scripture to do un-Islamic things (like killing innocents, oppressing people etc)
Umm.....really? They ask Ali (R.A.) to intercede on their behalf much like Christians asking Jesus (PBUH). Sounds like deification to me.
Thanks Joe from Lowell, and may I add that Ghazaffi has announced a ceasefire on at least one occasion while he continued to slaughter civilians. The only way to protect civilians from Ghazaffi is to neutralize him, and I for one am pretty O.K with that.
Hahaa. You're known by the company you keep
As far as I know there is only 1 Sunni monarchy with Shia majority i.e. Bahrain. Do you know of others?
I think the problem I America is twofold. 1) Americans are, by and large either apathetic or preoccupied with day to day survival and 2) there is only a bad option and a worse option at the ballot box, which contributes, in large part to #1. America needs a revolution but I don't think the Americans have the stomach for it.
Aaron, libya is almost completely Sunni, while Iran in mostly Shia. The possibility that they would be in the same "orbit" is just about impossible at this time
While i agree with some og yhe content of this post, a couple of things in it are odd. For example your use of "quotation marks" around the term foreign invasion. When a foreign country invades another country that is, by definition a foreign invasion. Putting the term in quotation marks implies that you think the term was incorrectly used. Don't you think that people have a right to fight against injustice in whatever way they can? The same points can be said for Iraq or are you of the opinion that the US had a legitimate right to invade and occupy these countries?
Arming the rebels may or may not be a good idea, but to say that it is wrong because some or many Libyans offered their lives to combat imperialism and injustice is, well, I'm sorry I can't come up with a better word than stupid!
Concider this my written version of a standing ovation. I agree with absolutely everything in this piece absolutely. I particularly like the metaphor of the Berlesconi (sp?) uprising. Bravo professor Cole, bravo indeed.
I'm not really sure America still has a constitution ;-/
Are you kidding?? Disarming the rebels would mean Gazaffi would simply reduce his population by...what number do you think is acceptable bin safwat? A couple hundred thousand? A million or two? Maybe then Gazaffi will sit around a campfire with the people and sing koombya while sharing his billions with them.
We are talking about a man who sent armed soldiers into a football stadium during a game to spray the crowds with bullets because they were singing something not to his liking. I think the death toll that time was 50 some. A pretty good start I guess.
Arming the rebels is the only solution. Not a pretty solution, or "politically correct" maybe, but pragmatic and just.
Well, I suppose I would have to agree that the governments, and some influential groups in those countries are acting on racist ideology.
The qur'an speaks very eloquently on this issue, but sadly many Muslims choose to ignore it. I guess that means that Muslims are the same as anybody else, i.e. They pick and choose their scripture. To be honest, I think Judaism is the only major religion that preaches that it's followers are superior in this world as well as the next.
Your question is worded strangely though. To answer it as it is worded, I would say that ALL Saudi's, Packistani's, Americans, Peruvian's etc who discriminate on the basis of religion are acting in a racist way. But, if you mean that these people represent a majority, I have no way of knowing that.
@William H Barkell. It's not my logic, it's my dictionary.
Uninformed comment, with all due respect, I think you ARE a bit naive to think that the rebels would face anything but an agonizing death if they gave up now. Gazaffi has a history of reaching beyond his borders to kill those he perceives as enemies, and he at least appears to be operating in some other form of reality. I know that people are being disappeared in Tripoli (one informed friend put the number at over 1000 people). The same friend, who is living in North America just recently received a death threat from one of Gazaffi's goons. The solution to this conflict is to arm the rebels so they can deal with Gazaffi in a homegrown, Libyan way, and set up whatever type of government THEY want.
William, my dictionary includes bias on the basis of religion as an indicator of racism.
From the list of books cited, the shebab movement will probably produce some decent scholars. This is not the picture we get of the movement from MSM. If this report is true, I hope these people can continue so we can all benefit from these islamicly educated youth.
Sha'b refers to all the people, Muslims Christians athiests etc. within a particular frame of reference i.e. inside Libya. Ummah refers to, as you quoted, the community of believers, no matter where they are
Lorne, how was the Kool-aid?? Mr. Chavez has been elected at least 13 times. How many times was Bush elected?
Lol, Hillary in a tent!! What a marvelous fantasy. Thank you for the positive mental picture.
Seriously though, I agree with the majority who feel that Mubarak stepping down was only a small victory, not the end of the struggle. Already the MSM is spinning stories about the MB bogeyman, and poor Israel's vulnerability. You gotta give it to those zionists though, nobody has perfected the art of victimhood like they have.
Garrison, shariah law guarantees religious freedom! Shariah law is based on the qur'an and the sunnah of the prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon him. It may have been co-opted by certain groups and those groups may have used weak or poorly researched decisions but the source of shariah law is far more socially advanced then any other system. Show me an abuse of shariah law and I can point to at least as many abuses under western legal tradition. For example, if you believe say American law is superior you would have to agree that African Americans are far less law abiding than white folks, given the higher proportion of them in the penal system.
People in the west need to realize that their "instinctual" abhorence of shariah law, the Muslim brotherhood, the (true) concept of jihad and all things Islamic
Are a result of mass media hype and have very little to do with reality.
Are there criminals, or angry and misguided people in the world who are bent on creating fitnah in the world to achieve their aims? Absolutely! Are the issues that anger them legitimate? Undoutedly! Are there methods legitimate under shariah? Not at all!!! Do they represent the Muslim ummah?
No! The only thing I have in common with those people is a desire for justice, but agreeing on one point should not make me or my co-religionists guilty for those peoples actions.
What is your basis for your anti MB stance?
Probably more support then Bush, Obama, Harper et. al. As well.
Lol. Shortest, funniest news report ever.
The only thing funnier is mainstream America fails to see the irony.
Could you clarify the second to last sentence in the second paragraph. I reject the idea of saints (other than the 10 who were promised jennah), the erection of shrines to dead people, and most forms of "spiritual music". Does that make me a "fundamentalist"?
I also reject the term "fundamentalist" to describe people who do not adhere to the fundamentals, and contradictory
terms like "islamofascist" or" Islamic terrorist"
Hahaaa. I was just trying to formulate a responce to PHUD1's comment, now it's been done, thanks RASKOLNIKOV.
I was thinking weight just collectively ignore him, but on reflection, that would allow him to spread his or her or their injurious falsehoods so maybe the answer is to collectively pounce on his idiocy and call him out as the propagandist he, she, they is/ are.
Done. On my wife's account, as I don't have one.
Aadil, I would like to send you my contact info, but would prefer not to publish it for all to see. Some articles on some blogs have a link to the author included, but this one does not. Any suggestions?
I am in agreement with most of this article. I could only add that a) under Islamic law, it is the responsibility of the state, not the individual, to carry out punishment of criminals and b) the responsibility of the individual to spread Islam, for the most part by having exemplary character. Unfortunately this sad episode shows that too many Muslims do not know their own faith.
It is my understanding that those people who were executed after the opening of Makka were fervent and unrepentant slanderers, not the run of the mill hatred who made up a significant portion of the Makkan citizenry at the time i. e. this is significant evidence that ordinary running off at the mouth is not sufficient to warrant capital punishment or else there would have been a blood bath which, all reports indicate, there was not.
Yeah, negotiating for pie the isrelis continue to eat. I'm sure when Abbas et al have nothing left, bibi et al will give them safe passage to... Somewhere :-/
So, Juan, what are these fundamentals of Islam that the fundamentalists are adhering to?
Juan. You should research the origins of the term "salafi". You may find that there is nothing narrow minded about Islam. BTW, I am quite uninterested in Muslim "traditions" that serve to separate Muslims from Islam. Your comment is condescending and atypical of your usually balanced approach. I am aware of what the term salifi (and wahabi and fundamentalist and islamowhatever) has come to mean but as a person who loves language, I prefer to think and speak as though words had at least some lasting meaning. In a world where "Islamic terrorism" is not seen as an oxymoron it would be nice to have someone not use that kind of non-language. (I forget the term from "1984")
Yeah, super390, I agree, but To comment on every aspect of this that disappoints me would likely fill a small booklet.
One thing though, this graphically illustrates why the Muslim world is in such a mess.
Sorry, meaty fingers :-/. I was saying we don't even celebrate the birth of Muhammad, peace be upon him (and Issa too) so why celebrate any other prophets birth.
For the non-Muslim, I think it's difficult to understand my distaste for this, but it is a)putting Islam aside to grovel to unbelievers and b) done by our supposed leaders who should be chosen on the basis of their knowledge rather than fluke of birth, and these "sheikhs" apparently are more concerned with bowing to shirk than fulfilling their true responsibility which is caring for their people and showing that Islam is the correct path.
As a Muslim, this saddens me. On one level, the gross display of wealth is crude and "over the top" on a second level, the fact that this display is done to honor, not the prophet Issa, but a christian version of Issa as a third of a three head god.On a third level, Muslims (or at least practicing Sunnis) do not celebrate the birth of anyone as an annual event, including ourselves or Muhammad (sulallah whu Of course, my options, as a pr
I wish everyone could see this. I also wish we Muslims could be as eloquent, but on further reflection, many Muslims are (such as Gary Miller) but for some odd reason ;-/ these people don't seem to get air time. I would love to watch Jamal Badawi's weekly broadcast on CNN, but alas... Perhaps those scholars' agents are not doing their jobs (haha)
David, are you serious? The Palestinian representatives have bent over backwards time and time again selling out their own people, conceding land and rights, bowing to illegitimate Israeli demands. I'm happy to see Abbass show a spine, but realistically, he may as well go back further in history to define the borders.
The Israeli's will give nothing and expect everything as long as they have the US backing them. Without backing they would, to a man run for home
It's quite a streach to say that the Nazi's massacred Jews because they had no country. Actually it's more than a stretch, it's simplistic, self serving ( if you're a Zionist) misleading and probably a lot of other things to boot. Lot's of groups lack a country of their own and are still surviving. I am very happy that this Zionist use of the holocaust to promote their agenda is beginning to be seen for what it really is, disgusting. If zionists really believe the holocaust was such a horrible thing, why do they copy so many of it's strategies in Palestine?